[Freeswitch-dev] Ecasound support in FreeSWITCH?

[Steve Underwood]

Hi Kristian,

What you are doing now looks very elementary, and there is no real 
reason to use ecasound. I don't know what you intend to do as you flesh 
out this quality assessment, but its not clear to me where ecasound 
would ever be a big benefit in such a tool.

Not using ecasound certainly simplifies its licencing issues. :-)

Regards,
Steve


Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> William,
>
>   That's what I do now and it's somewhat clunky.
>
>   There is one advantage: you can continually tweak ecasound params to
> look for other audio issues and reprocess the files.  Other than that
> it seems like a module is the way to go.
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:35 AM, William Suffill
> <william.suffill at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Well placing calls and analyzing the results after the fact would avoid any
>> licensing issues. As long as you have recordings that could be processed the
>> concept should still work.
>>
>>
>> - W
>>
>> PS: Yes haven't had any coffee yet so might me out of my mind =)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
>> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>