2 nodes in shared DB, node1 and node2 respectively with hostname node1.mydomain.org node2.mydomain.org the profile name is called mydomain.org which is shared by the 2 nodes. a user registers on node1 and wait calls. someone from external gateway call him, so user@node1.mydomain.org or user@node2.mydomain.org both it works well. but from user@mydomain.org it reaches the callee one time on three. my question is: can I avoid NAPTR SRV rules and replace it by a TCP load balancing server ? (if I use full TCP for SIP messages and UDP as normal after media negotiation) because it seems that NAPTR SRV work only if the caller proxy understands it. with a TCP load balancer I can avoid this, but not sure if it won't break the SIP protocol. Thanks Franck
People use outbound proxy for that purpose, so all traffic goes to it. O. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
2 nodes in shared DB, node1 and node2 respectively with hostname node1.mydomain.org node2.mydomain.org the profile name is called mydomain.org which is shared by the 2 nodes. a user registers on node1 and wait calls. someone from external gateway call him, so user@node1.mydomain.org or user@node2.mydomain.org both it works well. but from user@mydomain.org it reaches the callee one time on three.
my question is: can I avoid NAPTR SRV rules and replace it by a TCP load balancing server ? (if I use full TCP for SIP messages and UDP as normal after media negotiation) because it seems that NAPTR SRV work only if the caller proxy understands it. with a TCP load balancer I can avoid this, but not sure if it won't break the SIP protocol.
Thanks
Franck
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (2)
-
Madovsky
-
Ognjen Seslija