You may want to experiment with FS master git for video related things. That code is changing very often. There will probably be no more development on video functionality in 1.2. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:13 AM, marino.mileti@alice.it < marino.mileti@alice.it> wrote:

Hi all,

i'm using FS 1.2.17 and i'm trying to implement this scenario.. A, B and C are using same client, same codec (audio & video). FS is configured to bypass media (RTP directly between endpoint, no passthrought )

User A make a video call to user B, and user B transfer this call to user C...

The problem is that when B transfer the call to C FS establishes an RTP session with A (audio/video) and an RTP session (audio/video) with C...OK Then FS has to "bridge" the 2 legs and sends 2 INVITE (one for A and one for C) in order to establish the RTP communication between A and C...but in the SDP the video port still remain the dynamic RTP port used by FS and not the RTP port of client (A or C) ...so audio is working (the port are changed correctly) but video no :(

Have I forgot to set some parameter or is it a bug?

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- Anthony Minessale II ♬ @anthmfs ♬ @FreeSWITCH ♬ ☞ http://freeswitch.org/ ☞ http://cluecon.com/ ☞ http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH ☞ irc.freenode.net #freeswitch ☞ *http://freeswitch.org/g+ <http://freeswitch.org/g+>* ClueCon Weekly Development Call ☎ sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org ☎ +19193869900