icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
Hello all, I'm going on the fourth day with no response from icall's support on this issue, so I would greatly appreciate any guidance. Freeswitch successfully registers with icalls outbound server, sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net, and incoming calls are handled properly. But when I try to call a land-line with pa call 1813968XXXX, I get a response of 480 Temporarily Unavailable. I've also registered my external ip address with icalls servers. Also, this works "originate sofia/internal/9996@conference.freeswitch.org 1000", but this doesn't "originate sofia/internal/1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 1000." Windows XP SP3, 32-bit, 1.5gb FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4 (14460) Here's the pa call sip trace from wireshark: INVITE sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060> Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE Contact: <sip:gw+icall@173.65.36.19:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.4-14460 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 316 Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1283092013 1283092014 IN IP4 173.65.36.19 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 173.65.36.19 t=0 0 m=audio 23986 RTP/AVP 10 0 8 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:10 L16/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 a=ptime:20 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060> Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE User-Agent: CoreSSP SBC Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily Unavailable Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;tag=FQK8XBFmHggUg Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE User-Agent: CoreSSP SBC Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, refer Reason: Q.850;cause=16;text="NORMAL_CLEARING" Content-Length: 0 Remote-Party-ID: "1813968XXXX" <sip:1813968XXXX@8.19.97.6> ACK sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;tag=FQK8XBFmHggUg Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 ACK Content-Length: 0 Thanks in advance.
Disable no-sense for PSTN termination codec L16, make PCMU primary. On Wednesday 01 September 2010, mdale111@verizon.net wrote:
Hello all,
I'm going on the fourth day with no response from icall's support on this issue, so I would greatly appreciate any guidance.
Freeswitch successfully registers with icalls outbound server, sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net, and incoming calls are handled properly. But when I try to call a land-line with pa call 1813968XXXX, I get a response of 480 Temporarily Unavailable. I've also registered my external ip address with icalls servers.
Also, this works "originate sofia/internal/9996@conference.freeswitch.org 1000", but this doesn't "originate sofia/internal/1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 1000."
Windows XP SP3, 32-bit, 1.5gb FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4 (14460)
Here's the pa call sip trace from wireshark:
INVITE sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3 cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060> Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE Contact: <sip:gw+icall@173.65.36.19:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.4-14460 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 316 Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;p rivacy=off
v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1283092013 1283092014 IN IP4 173.65.36.19 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 173.65.36.19 t=0 0 m=audio 23986 RTP/AVP 10 0 8 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:10 L16/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 a=ptime:20
SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3 cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060> Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE User-Agent: CoreSSP SBC Content-Length: 0
SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily Unavailable Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3 cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;tag=FQK8XBFmHggUg Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE User-Agent: CoreSSP SBC Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, refer Reason: Q.850;cause=16;text="NORMAL_CLEARING" Content-Length: 0 Remote-Party-ID: "1813968XXXX" <sip:1813968XXXX@8.19.97.6>
ACK sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3 cymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;tag=FQK8XBFmHggUg Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 ACK Content-Length: 0
Thanks in advance.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I don't think there is much you can do about that short of routing calls for that area out another provider. About 20-25% of our calls out icall get rejected, usually with 500 errors. We send them out another provider and it works fine. And their support sucks..... -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of mdale111@verizon.net Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:47 PM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE Hello all, I'm going on the fourth day with no response from icall's support on this issue, so I would greatly appreciate any guidance. Freeswitch successfully registers with icalls outbound server, sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net, and incoming calls are handled properly. But when I try to call a land-line with pa call 1813968XXXX, I get a response of 480 Temporarily Unavailable. I've also registered my external ip address with icalls servers. Also, this works "originate sofia/internal/9996@conference.freeswitch.org 1000", but this doesn't "originate sofia/internal/1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 1000." Windows XP SP3, 32-bit, 1.5gb FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4 (14460) Here's the pa call sip trace from wireshark: INVITE sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3c ymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060> Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE Contact: <sip:gw+icall@173.65.36.19:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.4-14460 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 316 Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;pr ivacy=off v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1283092013 1283092014 IN IP4 173.65.36.19 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 173.65.36.19 t=0 0 m=audio 23986 RTP/AVP 10 0 8 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:10 L16/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 a=ptime:20 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3c ymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060> Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE User-Agent: CoreSSP SBC Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily Unavailable Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3c ymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;tag=FQK8XBFmHggUg Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 INVITE User-Agent: CoreSSP SBC Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, refer Reason: Q.850;cause=16;text="NORMAL_CLEARING" Content-Length: 0 Remote-Party-ID: "1813968XXXX" <sip:1813968XXXX@8.19.97.6> ACK sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.65.36.19;rport;branch=z9hG4bKg0DHp06gr9Utj Max-Forwards: 70 From: "username" <sip:cust_username@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060;transport=udp>;tag=43Sy3c ymXr8vH To: <sip:1813968XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;tag=FQK8XBFmHggUg Call-ID: 2896ecba-2e54-122e-88b1-073747d47dd9 CSeq: 1221935 ACK Content-Length: 0 Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I'm going to guess its because he has L16 as the first codec. /b On Sep 2, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Peder wrote:
I don't think there is much you can do about that short of routing calls for that area out another provider. About 20-25% of our calls out icall get rejected, usually with 500 errors. We send them out another provider and it works fine. And their support sucks.....
Same happens if you have g729 as first codec and you didn't ask icall to enable g729 on US calls. On Thursday 02 September 2010, Brian West wrote:
I'm going to guess its because he has L16 as the first codec.
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Peder wrote:
I don't think there is much you can do about that short of routing calls for that area out another provider. About 20-25% of our calls out icall get rejected, usually with 500 errors. We send them out another provider and it works fine. And their support sucks.....
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I've tried using <param name="outbound-codec-prefs" value="PCMU, PCMA"/> and the INVITE offered only these two codecs, but I still got 480 Temporarily Unavailable. So I just set it back to the default. I've since found that if I set the caller id number to 1234567, the call always goes through . If I use anything else, the call fails. Using 1234567, I then get this remote id in the INVITE header: Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:1234567@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off instead of: Remote-Party-ID: "username"<sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off Am I formatting the caller id incorrectly? Thanks, Mark Dale -------------------------------------------------- From: "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:56 PM To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480TemporarilyUnavailable for outbound INVITE
Same happens if you have g729 as first codec and you didn't ask icall to enable g729 on US calls.
On Thursday 02 September 2010, Brian West wrote:
I'm going to guess its because he has L16 as the first codec.
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Peder wrote:
I don't think there is much you can do about that short of routing calls for that area out another provider. About 20-25% of our calls out icall get rejected, usually with 500 errors. We send them out another provider and it works fine. And their support sucks.....
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Do you provide a valid caller id number in invite? CID matters a lot... On Thursday 02 September 2010, Mark Dale wrote:
I've tried using <param name="outbound-codec-prefs" value="PCMU, PCMA"/> and the INVITE offered only these two codecs, but I still got 480 Temporarily Unavailable. So I just set it back to the default.
I've since found that if I set the caller id number to 1234567, the call always goes through . If I use anything else, the call fails. Using 1234567, I then get this remote id in the INVITE header: Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:1234567@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;priv acy=off instead of: Remote-Party-ID: "username"<sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;sc reen=yes;privacy=off
Am I formatting the caller id incorrectly?
Thanks,
Mark Dale
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:56 PM To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480TemporarilyUnavailable for outbound INVITE
Same happens if you have g729 as first codec and you didn't ask icall to enable g729 on US calls.
On Thursday 02 September 2010, Brian West wrote:
I'm going to guess its because he has L16 as the first codec.
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Peder wrote:
I don't think there is much you can do about that short of routing calls for that area out another provider. About 20-25% of our calls out icall get rejected, usually with 500 errors. We send them out another provider and it works fine. And their support sucks.....
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
could be that your xml for your gateway is wrong... can you post that? /b On Sep 2, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
I've tried using <param name="outbound-codec-prefs" value="PCMU, PCMA"/> and the INVITE offered only these two codecs, but I still got 480 Temporarily Unavailable. So I just set it back to the default.
I've since found that if I set the caller id number to 1234567, the call always goes through . If I use anything else, the call fails. Using 1234567, I then get this remote id in the INVITE header: Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:1234567@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off instead of: Remote-Party-ID: "username"<sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Am I formatting the caller id incorrectly?
Thanks,
Mark Dale
I used what icall recommend for the gateway: <include> <gateway name="icall"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> <gateway name="icall_international"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> </include> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
could be that your xml for your gateway is wrong... can you post that?
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
I've tried using <param name="outbound-codec-prefs" value="PCMU, PCMA"/> and the INVITE offered only these two codecs, but I still got 480 Temporarily Unavailable. So I just set it back to the default.
I've since found that if I set the caller id number to 1234567, the call always goes through . If I use anything else, the call fails. Using 1234567, I then get this remote id in the INVITE header: Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:1234567@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off instead of: Remote-Party-ID: "username"<sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Am I formatting the caller id incorrectly?
Thanks,
Mark Dale
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
GW settings are not related to global outbound settings. Did you ever study FS config files? On Thursday 02 September 2010, mdale111@verizon.net wrote:
I used what icall recommend for the gateway:
<include> <gateway name="icall"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> <gateway name="icall_international"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> </include>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
could be that your xml for your gateway is wrong... can you post that?
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
I've tried using <param name="outbound-codec-prefs" value="PCMU, PCMA"/> and the INVITE offered only these two codecs, but I still got 480 Temporarily Unavailable. So I just set it back to the default.
I've since found that if I set the caller id number to 1234567, the call always goes through . If I use anything else, the call fails. Using 1234567, I then get this remote id in the INVITE header: Remote-Party-ID: "username" <sip:1234567@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling;screen=yes;p rivacy=off instead of: Remote-Party-ID: "username"<sip:813995XXXX@sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net:5060>;party=calling ;screen=yes;privacy=off
Am I formatting the caller id incorrectly?
Thanks,
Mark Dale
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets. /b On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:10 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net> wrote:
I used what icall recommend for the gateway:
<include> <gateway name="icall"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> <gateway name="icall_international"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> </include>
Freeswitch is located behind a WESTELL A90-9100EM15-10 cable modem that is configured with the Freeswitch server in the DMZ. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets.
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:10 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net> wrote:
I used what icall recommend for the gateway:
<include> <gateway name="icall"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> <gateway name="icall_international"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> </include>
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
http://community.vzw.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/How-do-I-disable-SIP-ALG-on-the-We... /b On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:36 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net> wrote:
Freeswitch is located behind a WESTELL A90-9100EM15-10 cable modem that is configured with the Freeswitch server in the DMZ.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets.
/b
Also see http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Routers+SIP+ALG . SIP ALG is the worst thing ever invented... On Thursday 02 September 2010, Brian West wrote:
http://community.vzw.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/How-do-I-disable-SIP-ALG-on-the-W estell-9100em/td-p/124215
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:36 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net> wrote:
Freeswitch is located behind a WESTELL A90-9100EM15-10 cable modem that is configured with the Freeswitch server in the DMZ.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets.
/b
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Hello List, Which is the best Colocation/Dedicated Service Provider for VoIP Soft Switches. Currently we are using Softlayer but having issues and through our experience with them, they are not suitable for VOIP. Please recommend good dedicated server hosting providers. Regards Khurram
If you don't mind the yearly commitment, you could try NTT Verio. All their servers come with 100 Mbps unmetered bandwidth. We have been using them for some time and currently have 4 servers. Intel E5504 Quad Core processors, 4 GB RAM, 2 SCSI HDDs in RAID. All running great! Regards HASSAN On 2010-09-03, Khurram Shafi <khurram@breezecom.ae> wrote:
Hello List,
Which is the best Colocation/Dedicated Service Provider for VoIP Soft Switches. Currently we are using Softlayer but having issues and through our experience with them, they are not suitable for VOIP.
Please recommend good dedicated server hosting providers.
Regards
Khurram
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sent from my mobile device
What kind of hosting do you recommend with NTT Verio? I found that there are several types of hosting e.g. dedicated Linux hosting, VPS hosting etc. On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan@usa.net> wrote:
If you don't mind the yearly commitment, you could try NTT Verio. All their servers come with 100 Mbps unmetered bandwidth.
We have been using them for some time and currently have 4 servers. Intel E5504 Quad Core processors, 4 GB RAM, 2 SCSI HDDs in RAID. All running great!
Regards HASSAN
On 2010-09-03, Khurram Shafi <khurram@breezecom.ae> wrote:
Hello List,
Which is the best Colocation/Dedicated Service Provider for VoIP Soft Switches. Currently we are using Softlayer but having issues and through our experience with them, they are not suitable for VOIP.
Please recommend good dedicated server hosting providers.
Regards
Khurram
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
We use dedicated servers running either Linux or Windows. Regards HASSAN On 2010-09-15, Farhan Husain <farhan.husain@csebuet.org> wrote:
What kind of hosting do you recommend with NTT Verio? I found that there are several types of hosting e.g. dedicated Linux hosting, VPS hosting etc.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan@usa.net> wrote:
If you don't mind the yearly commitment, you could try NTT Verio. All their servers come with 100 Mbps unmetered bandwidth.
We have been using them for some time and currently have 4 servers. Intel E5504 Quad Core processors, 4 GB RAM, 2 SCSI HDDs in RAID. All running great!
Regards HASSAN
On 2010-09-03, Khurram Shafi <khurram@breezecom.ae> wrote:
Hello List,
Which is the best Colocation/Dedicated Service Provider for VoIP Soft Switches. Currently we are using Softlayer but having issues and through our experience with them, they are not suitable for VOIP.
Please recommend good dedicated server hosting providers.
Regards
Khurram
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sent from my mobile device
Thanks Hassan. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan@usa.net> wrote:
We use dedicated servers running either Linux or Windows.
Regards HASSAN
On 2010-09-15, Farhan Husain <farhan.husain@csebuet.org> wrote:
What kind of hosting do you recommend with NTT Verio? I found that there are several types of hosting e.g. dedicated Linux hosting, VPS hosting etc.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan@usa.net> wrote:
If you don't mind the yearly commitment, you could try NTT Verio. All their servers come with 100 Mbps unmetered bandwidth.
We have been using them for some time and currently have 4 servers. Intel E5504 Quad Core processors, 4 GB RAM, 2 SCSI HDDs in RAID. All running great!
Regards HASSAN
On 2010-09-03, Khurram Shafi <khurram@breezecom.ae> wrote:
Hello List,
Which is the best Colocation/Dedicated Service Provider for VoIP Soft Switches. Currently we are using Softlayer but having issues and through our experience with them, they are not suitable for VOIP.
Please recommend good dedicated server hosting providers.
Regards
Khurram
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Crap crap crap router :) David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. Le 02/09/2010 à 23:59, Brian West a écrit :
http://community.vzw.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/How-do-I-disable-SIP-ALG-on-the-We...
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:36 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net
wrote:
Freeswitch is located behind a WESTELL A90-9100EM15-10 cable modem that is configured with the Freeswitch server in the DMZ.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets.
/b
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
SIP ALG is set to disabled on my modem. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
http://community.vzw.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/How-do-I-disable-SIP-ALG-on-the-We...
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:36 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net> wrote:
Freeswitch is located behind a WESTELL A90-9100EM15-10 cable modem that is configured with the Freeswitch server in the DMZ.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets.
/b
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
icall sent me this response, "We have made a modification to the interstate route for this prefix. Please re-test when possible." This seems to have fixed the problem. SIP ALG is configurable on this modem, and currently it is set to disabled. Thanks to everyone for the help. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
http://community.vzw.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/How-do-I-disable-SIP-ALG-on-the-We...
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:36 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net> wrote:
Freeswitch is located behind a WESTELL A90-9100EM15-10 cable modem that is configured with the Freeswitch server in the DMZ.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets.
/b
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:36 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> wrote:
Freeswitch is located behind a WESTELL A90-9100EM15-10 cable modem that is configured with the Freeswitch server in the DMZ.
Check that Westell. I downloaded the manual and it looks like it has all sorts of stuff that could futz with your packets. It does indeed have ALGs but I could not specifically see a SIP ALG in the docs. However, if I were you I absolutely would not trust that thing AT ALL. If there's any way that that thing can give you a trace of your SIP traffic then by all means grab it. Until you can prove otherwise, that device *IS* your problem.
-MC
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] icall's carrier service returns 480 Temporarily Unavailable for outbound INVITE
What kind of firewall do you have? Clearly you have something between YOU and icall mucking with the packets.
/b
On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:10 PM, <mdale111@verizon.net> <mdale111@verizon.net
wrote:
I used what icall recommend for the gateway:
<include> <gateway name="icall"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="sbc01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> <gateway name="icall_international"> <!-- Replace these value with your iCall Carrier Services username and password. --> <!-- Even if you use an IP-based sub-account, FreeSWITCH needs these values --> <param name="username" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="password" value="xxxxxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="from-user" value="cust_xxxxxxxxx" /> <param name="proxy" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <param name="realm" value="gw01-car.dal.us.icall.net" /> <!-- Set to "false" for IP-based accounts, or "true" for registration based --> <param name="register" value="true" /> </gateway> </include>
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
This thread might be closed already but I too am having this issue... I then started testing phone numbers and it appears that certain routes have an issue. I called an AT&T mobile number and got a 480 but I then immediately called a downtown Atlanta phone number and it went through no problem... I have an open ticket with them and have updated with these findings. And I thought this was my problem for the longest time... Hmmmm... Thanks, Perry
participants (11)
-
Brian West
-
David Ponzone
-
Farhan Husain
-
Khurram Shafi
-
Mark Dale
-
mdale111＠verizon.net
-
Michael Collins
-
Nyamul Hassan
-
Peder
-
Perry P
-
Sergey Okhapkin