Does anyone have mod_lcr running against a MSSQL database through ODBC? What modifications did you have to make? -- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
You can probably just use odbc, have you tried that? ᐧ On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer <grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have mod_lcr running against a MSSQL database through ODBC? What modifications did you have to make?
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Yes, I have ODBC working on my FS box, and I have updated the lcr.conf.xml file with the DSN. The problem is that when I load the module I get errors like: 2016-10-06 15:35:35.560192 [ERR] switch_odbc.c:522 ERR: [SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1] [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] 2016-10-06 15:35:35.560212 [ERR] switch_core_sqldb.c:587 ODBC SQL ERR [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1 MSSQL doesn't accept "LIMIT 1". The equivalent syntax would be "SELECT top 1 codec FROM carrier_gateway". I was wondering if I will have to make a custum version of mod_lcr (which I must then maintain), or if there is some setting that I am not seeing to make it compatible with MS SQL. If anybody has gone down this road, would like some feedback. Thanks! On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
You can probably just use odbc, have you tried that? ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have mod_lcr running against a MSSQL database through ODBC? What modifications did you have to make?
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
It shouldn't be too hard to patch it for MSSQL, maybe that's the way to go. I have no idea whether anyone's implemented that, sorry. ᐧ On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer <grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I have ODBC working on my FS box, and I have updated the lcr.conf.xml file with the DSN. The problem is that when I load the module I get errors like:
2016-10-06 15:35:35.560192 [ERR] switch_odbc.c:522 ERR: [SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1] [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] 2016-10-06 15:35:35.560212 [ERR] switch_core_sqldb.c:587 ODBC SQL ERR [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1
MSSQL doesn't accept "LIMIT 1". The equivalent syntax would be "SELECT top 1 codec FROM carrier_gateway".
I was wondering if I will have to make a custum version of mod_lcr (which I must then maintain), or if there is some setting that I am not seeing to make it compatible with MS SQL. If anybody has gone down this road, would like some feedback.
Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
You can probably just use odbc, have you tried that? ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have mod_lcr running against a MSSQL database through ODBC? What modifications did you have to make?
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
____________________________________________________________ _____________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Thanks David. Looking though the code, I see that the LIMIT 1 clause is used several times in contexts similar to this: /* Checking for cid field, adding if needed */ if (db_check("SELECT cid FROM lcr LIMIT 1") == SWITCH_TRUE) { switch_log_printf(SWITCH_CHANNEL_LOG, SWITCH_LOG_DEBUG, "cid field defined.\n"); I gather they are limiting to 1 record because there might be people that have huge tables and it wouldn't make sense to bring back all those records... But as can be seen below, limiting records doesn't seem to be one of those standard SQL things... Returning only the first N records in a SQL query differs quite a bit between database platforms. Here's some samples: *Microsoft SQL Server* SELECT *TOP 10* column FROM table *PostgreSQL and MySQL* SELECT column FROM table*LIMIT 10* *Oracle* SELECT column FROM table*WHERE ROWNUM <= 10* *Sybase* *SET rowcount 10* SELECT column FROM table *Firebird* SELECT *FIRST 10* column FROM table I'm wondering if they couldn't do something like "select distinct XXXX.." to mitigate this, but still be compatible with all ODBC backends. SELECT DISTINCT seems to be standard (at least I checked ORACLE, POSTGRES, mySQL and MSSQL. Guillermo On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:29 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
It shouldn't be too hard to patch it for MSSQL, maybe that's the way to go. I have no idea whether anyone's implemented that, sorry. ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I have ODBC working on my FS box, and I have updated the lcr.conf.xml file with the DSN. The problem is that when I load the module I get errors like:
2016-10-06 15:35:35.560192 [ERR] switch_odbc.c:522 ERR: [SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1] [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] 2016-10-06 15:35:35.560212 [ERR] switch_core_sqldb.c:587 ODBC SQL ERR [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1
MSSQL doesn't accept "LIMIT 1". The equivalent syntax would be "SELECT top 1 codec FROM carrier_gateway".
I was wondering if I will have to make a custum version of mod_lcr (which I must then maintain), or if there is some setting that I am not seeing to make it compatible with MS SQL. If anybody has gone down this road, would like some feedback.
Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
You can probably just use odbc, have you tried that? ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have mod_lcr running against a MSSQL database through ODBC? What modifications did you have to make?
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
____________________________________________________________ _____________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/free switch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
____________________________________________________________ _____________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
I don't know mod_lcr that well, but it seems to me they just want the first record from whatever set returned ordered by the order clause. If they all mean basically the same thing, meaning it will return the first record of the resulting set ordered, it should work. Unless I'm mistaking something. On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:53 AM Guillermo Ruiz Camauer <grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks David.
Looking though the code, I see that the LIMIT 1 clause is used several times in contexts similar to this:
/* Checking for cid field, adding if needed */ if (db_check("SELECT cid FROM lcr LIMIT 1") == SWITCH_TRUE) { switch_log_printf(SWITCH_CHANNEL_LOG, SWITCH_LOG_DEBUG, "cid field defined.\n");
I gather they are limiting to 1 record because there might be people that have huge tables and it wouldn't make sense to bring back all those records...
But as can be seen below, limiting records doesn't seem to be one of those standard SQL things...
Returning only the first N records in a SQL query differs quite a bit between database platforms. Here's some samples:
*Microsoft SQL Server*
SELECT *TOP 10* column FROM table
*PostgreSQL and MySQL*
SELECT column FROM table*LIMIT 10*
*Oracle*
SELECT column FROM table*WHERE ROWNUM <= 10*
*Sybase*
*SET rowcount 10* SELECT column FROM table
*Firebird*
SELECT *FIRST 10* column FROM table
I'm wondering if they couldn't do something like "select distinct XXXX.." to mitigate this, but still be compatible with all ODBC backends. SELECT DISTINCT seems to be standard (at least I checked ORACLE, POSTGRES, mySQL and MSSQL.
Guillermo
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:29 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
It shouldn't be too hard to patch it for MSSQL, maybe that's the way to go. I have no idea whether anyone's implemented that, sorry. ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I have ODBC working on my FS box, and I have updated the lcr.conf.xml file with the DSN. The problem is that when I load the module I get errors like:
2016-10-06 15:35:35.560192 [ERR] switch_odbc.c:522 ERR: [SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1] [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] 2016-10-06 15:35:35.560212 [ERR] switch_core_sqldb.c:587 ODBC SQL ERR [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1
MSSQL doesn't accept "LIMIT 1". The equivalent syntax would be "SELECT top 1 codec FROM carrier_gateway".
I was wondering if I will have to make a custum version of mod_lcr (which I must then maintain), or if there is some setting that I am not seeing to make it compatible with MS SQL. If anybody has gone down this road, would like some feedback.
Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
You can probably just use odbc, have you tried that? ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have mod_lcr running against a MSSQL database through ODBC? What modifications did you have to make?
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
You can fill jira. Think it is not difficult to implement it. сб, 8 окт. 2016 г. в 3:00, David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work@gmail.com>:
I don't know mod_lcr that well, but it seems to me they just want the first record from whatever set returned ordered by the order clause. If they all mean basically the same thing, meaning it will return the first record of the resulting set ordered, it should work. Unless I'm mistaking something. On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:53 AM Guillermo Ruiz Camauer <grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks David.
Looking though the code, I see that the LIMIT 1 clause is used several times in contexts similar to this:
/* Checking for cid field, adding if needed */ if (db_check("SELECT cid FROM lcr LIMIT 1") == SWITCH_TRUE) { switch_log_printf(SWITCH_CHANNEL_LOG, SWITCH_LOG_DEBUG, "cid field defined.\n");
I gather they are limiting to 1 record because there might be people that have huge tables and it wouldn't make sense to bring back all those records...
But as can be seen below, limiting records doesn't seem to be one of those standard SQL things...
Returning only the first N records in a SQL query differs quite a bit between database platforms. Here's some samples:
*Microsoft SQL Server*
SELECT *TOP 10* column FROM table
*PostgreSQL and MySQL*
SELECT column FROM table*LIMIT 10*
*Oracle*
SELECT column FROM table*WHERE ROWNUM <= 10*
*Sybase*
*SET rowcount 10* SELECT column FROM table
*Firebird*
SELECT *FIRST 10* column FROM table
I'm wondering if they couldn't do something like "select distinct XXXX.." to mitigate this, but still be compatible with all ODBC backends. SELECT DISTINCT seems to be standard (at least I checked ORACLE, POSTGRES, mySQL and MSSQL.
Guillermo
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:29 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
It shouldn't be too hard to patch it for MSSQL, maybe that's the way to go. I have no idea whether anyone's implemented that, sorry. ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I have ODBC working on my FS box, and I have updated the lcr.conf.xml file with the DSN. The problem is that when I load the module I get errors like:
2016-10-06 15:35:35.560192 [ERR] switch_odbc.c:522 ERR: [SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1] [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] 2016-10-06 15:35:35.560212 [ERR] switch_core_sqldb.c:587 ODBC SQL ERR [STATE: 42000 CODE 102 ERROR: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver 13 for SQL Server][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near '1'. ] SELECT codec FROM carrier_gateway LIMIT 1
MSSQL doesn't accept "LIMIT 1". The equivalent syntax would be "SELECT top 1 codec FROM carrier_gateway".
I was wondering if I will have to make a custum version of mod_lcr (which I must then maintain), or if there is some setting that I am not seeing to make it compatible with MS SQL. If anybody has gone down this road, would like some feedback.
Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
You can probably just use odbc, have you tried that? ᐧ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer < grcamauer@gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have mod_lcr running against a MSSQL database through ODBC? What modifications did you have to make?
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
On 7 October 2016 at 22:57, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
You can fill jira. Think it is not difficult to implement it.
I created it on behalf of Guillermo: https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-9625
we can move the conversation there. I don’t plan on taking on this work myself but if someone wants to test something and confirm its better, and does not have any performance regressions, I’d be happy to look at it. Also note that this mod supports custom sql strings.
On Oct 8, 2016, at 10:25 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboogie0@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7 October 2016 at 22:57, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
You can fill jira. Think it is not difficult to implement it.
I created it on behalf of Guillermo:
Thank you for creating the JIRA. On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:25 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboogie0@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7 October 2016 at 22:57, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
You can fill jira. Think it is not difficult to implement it.
I created it on behalf of Guillermo:
https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-9625
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
participants (5)
-
David Villasmil
-
Guillermo Ruiz Camauer
-
jungle Boogie
-
Michael Jerris
-
Sergey Safarov