Are anybody experiences issue when for some of calls ACK send to other IP. http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz in this case FS in bypass media with two profiles (1 to internet, 2 intranet). INVITE is send to DNS name that is resolved to 1. 10.0.9.32 2. 10.0.9.33 3. 10.0.9.34 4. 10.0.9.35 FS 1.6.19 Contact on 200 message is correct SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.0.9.51:12000;rport=39049;branch= z9hG4bKBH60NQjSZj36a From: "Anonymous" <sip:+12022553656@10.0.9.51>;tag= rH5cBQarr559D To: <sip:13013688630@metropolis.ack.one>;tag=UDv7UXv3B53Da Call-ID: b0e4d7e1-e79e-1236-8cb9-02420a000933 CSeq: 123998414 INVITE Contact: <sip:13013688630@10.0.9.33:11000;transport=tcp> User-Agent: proxy.ackone.com Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Now for future investigate FS upgrader to 1.6.20 and enabled siptrace and loglevel Sergey Safarov
root of issue ACK send to IP resolved via DNS for value defined as "fs_path", rather than defined in contact string. more details https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190 вт, 12 июн. 2018 г. в 10:30, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com>:
Are anybody experiences issue when for some of calls ACK send to other IP. http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz in this case FS in bypass media with two profiles (1 to internet, 2 intranet). INVITE is send to DNS name that is resolved to
1. 10.0.9.32 2. 10.0.9.33 3. 10.0.9.34 4. 10.0.9.35
FS 1.6.19
Contact on 200 message is correct
SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.0.9.51:12000;rport=39049;branch= z9hG4bKBH60NQjSZj36a From: "Anonymous" <sip:+12022553656@10.0.9.51>;tag= rH5cBQarr559D To: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@metropolis.ack.one>;tag=UDv7UXv3B53Da Call-ID: b0e4d7e1-e79e-1236-8cb9-02420a000933 CSeq: 123998414 INVITE Contact: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@10.0.9.33:11000;transport=tcp> User-Agent: proxy.ackone.com Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Now for future investigate FS upgrader to 1.6.20 and enabled siptrace and loglevel
Sergey Safarov
Setting fs_path like that is used to force a locked in outbound proxy for that dialog. The behavior you are seeing is intended behavior.
On Jun 12, 2018, at 4:45 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
root of issue ACK send to IP resolved via DNS for value defined as "fs_path", rather than defined in contact string.
more details https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190 <https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190>
вт, 12 июн. 2018 г. в 10:30, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com <mailto:s.safarov@gmail.com>>: Are anybody experiences issue when for some of calls ACK send to other IP. http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz <http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz> in this case FS in bypass media with two profiles (1 to internet, 2 intranet). INVITE is send to DNS name that is resolved to 10.0.9.32 10.0.9.33 10.0.9.34 10.0.9.35 FS 1.6.19
Contact on 200 message is correct
SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.0.9.51:1 <http://10.0.9.51:1/>2000;rport=39049;branch=z9hG4bKBH60NQjSZj36a From: "Anonymous" <sip:+12022553656@10.0.9.51 <mailto:sip%3A%2B12022553656@10.0.9.51>>;tag=rH5cBQarr559D To: <sip:13013688630 <tel:(301)%20368-8630>@metropolis.ack.one>;tag=UDv7UXv3B53Da Call-ID: b0e4d7e1-e79e-1236-8cb9-02420a000933 CSeq: 123998414 INVITE Contact: <sip:13013688630 <tel:(301)%20368-8630>@10.0.9.33:11000;transport=tcp> User-Agent: proxy.ackone.com <http://proxy.ackone.com/> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE
Now for future investigate FS upgrader to 1.6.20 and enabled siptrace and loglevel
Sergey Safarov
If FS ignores contact values and use fs_path like "Record-Route" SIP header, then ACK must be send to same IP used for INVITE. Without this whole session is broken. Please look call log. Call is dropped by remote end because ACK not received. вт, 19 июн. 2018 г. в 2:18, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com>:
Setting fs_path like that is used to force a locked in outbound proxy for that dialog. The behavior you are seeing is intended behavior.
On Jun 12, 2018, at 4:45 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
root of issue ACK send to IP resolved via DNS for value defined as "fs_path", rather than defined in contact string.
more details https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190
вт, 12 июн. 2018 г. в 10:30, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com>:
Are anybody experiences issue when for some of calls ACK send to other IP. http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz in this case FS in bypass media with two profiles (1 to internet, 2 intranet). INVITE is send to DNS name that is resolved to
1. 10.0.9.32 2. 10.0.9.33 3. 10.0.9.34 4. 10.0.9.35
FS 1.6.19
Contact on 200 message is correct
SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.0.9.51:12000;rport=39049;branch= z9hG4bKBH60NQjSZj36a From: "Anonymous" <sip:+12022553656@10.0.9.51>;tag= rH5cBQarr559D To: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@metropolis.ack.one>;tag=UDv7UXv3B53Da Call-ID: b0e4d7e1-e79e-1236-8cb9-02420a000933 CSeq: 123998414 INVITE Contact: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@10.0.9.33:11000;transport=tcp> User-Agent: proxy.ackone.com Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Now for future investigate FS upgrader to 1.6.20 and enabled siptrace and loglevel
Sergey Safarov
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
if you are using fs_path and expecting it to be anything other than a hardcoded outbound proxy then its not going to work like you expect.
On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
If FS ignores contact values and use fs_path like "Record-Route" SIP header, then ACK must be send to same IP used for INVITE. Without this whole session is broken. Please look call log. Call is dropped by remote end because ACK not received.
вт, 19 июн. 2018 г. в 2:18, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com <mailto:mike@jerris.com>>: Setting fs_path like that is used to force a locked in outbound proxy for that dialog. The behavior you are seeing is intended behavior.
On Jun 12, 2018, at 4:45 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com <mailto:s.safarov@gmail.com>> wrote:
root of issue ACK send to IP resolved via DNS for value defined as "fs_path", rather than defined in contact string.
more details https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190 <https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190>
вт, 12 июн. 2018 г. в 10:30, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com <mailto:s.safarov@gmail.com>>: Are anybody experiences issue when for some of calls ACK send to other IP. http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz <http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz> in this case FS in bypass media with two profiles (1 to internet, 2 intranet). INVITE is send to DNS name that is resolved to 10.0.9.32 10.0.9.33 10.0.9.34 10.0.9.35 FS 1.6.19
Contact on 200 message is correct
SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.0.9.51:1 <http://10.0.9.51:1/>2000;rport=39049;branch=z9hG4bKBH60NQjSZj36a From: "Anonymous" <sip:+12022553656@10.0.9.51 <mailto:sip%3A%2B12022553656@10.0.9.51>>;tag=rH5cBQarr559D To: <sip:13013688630 <tel:(301)%20368-8630>@metropolis.ack.one>;tag=UDv7UXv3B53Da Call-ID: b0e4d7e1-e79e-1236-8cb9-02420a000933 CSeq: 123998414 INVITE Contact: <sip:13013688630 <tel:(301)%20368-8630>@10.0.9.33:11000;transport=tcp> User-Agent: proxy.ackone.com <http://proxy.ackone.com/> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE
Now for future investigate FS upgrader to 1.6.20 and enabled siptrace and loglevel
Sergey Safarov
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com <mailto:sales@freeswitch.com> https://freeswitch.com <https://freeswitch.com/>
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss <https://freeswitch.com/oss> https://freeswitch.org/confluence <https://freeswitch.org/confluence> https://cluecon.com <https://cluecon.com/>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users> https://freeswitch.com <https://freeswitch.com/>_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
May be i misunderstanding something with call routing. I want route calls from FS inside private network to "google.com" (as example) via two FS (load balancing and redundancy) at edge of private network. I cannot use fs_path to route call via "edge FS", because session is maintained. May i can use other way to reach my goal? Sergey вт, 19 июн. 2018 г. в 20:43, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com>:
if you are using fs_path and expecting it to be anything other than a hardcoded outbound proxy then its not going to work like you expect.
On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
If FS ignores contact values and use fs_path like "Record-Route" SIP header, then ACK must be send to same IP used for INVITE. Without this whole session is broken. Please look call log. Call is dropped by remote end because ACK not received.
вт, 19 июн. 2018 г. в 2:18, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com>:
Setting fs_path like that is used to force a locked in outbound proxy for that dialog. The behavior you are seeing is intended behavior.
On Jun 12, 2018, at 4:45 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
root of issue ACK send to IP resolved via DNS for value defined as "fs_path", rather than defined in contact string.
more details https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190
вт, 12 июн. 2018 г. в 10:30, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com>:
Are anybody experiences issue when for some of calls ACK send to other IP. http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz in this case FS in bypass media with two profiles (1 to internet, 2 intranet). INVITE is send to DNS name that is resolved to
1. 10.0.9.32 2. 10.0.9.33 3. 10.0.9.34 4. 10.0.9.35
FS 1.6.19
Contact on 200 message is correct
SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.0.9.51:12000;rport=39049;branch= z9hG4bKBH60NQjSZj36a From: "Anonymous" <sip:+12022553656@10.0.9.51>;tag= rH5cBQarr559D To: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@metropolis.ack.one>;tag=UDv7UXv3B53Da Call-ID: b0e4d7e1-e79e-1236-8cb9-02420a000933 CSeq: 123998414 INVITE Contact: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@10.0.9.33:11000;transport=tcp> User-Agent: proxy.ackone.com Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Now for future investigate FS upgrader to 1.6.20 and enabled siptrace and loglevel
Sergey Safarov
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
Michael, you right FS send ACK to defined by "fs_path" But i use "domain" as "fs_path" value, and and "domain" is resolved to several IP via "A" records. In this case "INVITE" send to one IP of "hardcoded outbound proxy" and ACK send to other IP of "hardcoded outbound proxy". But this this IPs is not same host. This is two FS used for load balancing and HA. Because FS is B2BUA and no one of "hardcoded outbound proxy" have established properly call, then call is dropped. As workaround I can manually create two legs/calls. One via first IP "hardcoded outbound proxy" directly and second call via second IP. But this will be "hardcoded IP" in dialplan. That also not fine. Sergey вт, 19 июн. 2018 г. в 20:43, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com>:
if you are using fs_path and expecting it to be anything other than a hardcoded outbound proxy then its not going to work like you expect.
On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
If FS ignores contact values and use fs_path like "Record-Route" SIP header, then ACK must be send to same IP used for INVITE. Without this whole session is broken. Please look call log. Call is dropped by remote end because ACK not received.
вт, 19 июн. 2018 г. в 2:18, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com>:
Setting fs_path like that is used to force a locked in outbound proxy for that dialog. The behavior you are seeing is intended behavior.
On Jun 12, 2018, at 4:45 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
root of issue ACK send to IP resolved via DNS for value defined as "fs_path", rather than defined in contact string.
more details https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-11190
вт, 12 июн. 2018 г. в 10:30, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com>:
Are anybody experiences issue when for some of calls ACK send to other IP. http://prntscr.com/jtxkbz in this case FS in bypass media with two profiles (1 to internet, 2 intranet). INVITE is send to DNS name that is resolved to
1. 10.0.9.32 2. 10.0.9.33 3. 10.0.9.34 4. 10.0.9.35
FS 1.6.19
Contact on 200 message is correct
SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.0.9.51:12000;rport=39049;branch= z9hG4bKBH60NQjSZj36a From: "Anonymous" <sip:+12022553656@10.0.9.51>;tag= rH5cBQarr559D To: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@metropolis.ack.one>;tag=UDv7UXv3B53Da Call-ID: b0e4d7e1-e79e-1236-8cb9-02420a000933 CSeq: 123998414 INVITE Contact: <sip:13013688630 <(301)%20368-8630>@10.0.9.33:11000;transport=tcp> User-Agent: proxy.ackone.com Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Now for future investigate FS upgrader to 1.6.20 and enabled siptrace and loglevel
Sergey Safarov
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
participants (2)
-
Michael Jerris
-
Sergey Safarov