with 100K paying customers, you should be able to afford a redundant solution and bigger boxes :) say, with 1:20 ratio, at peak hours you would get 5000 simultaneous calls. It's quite a lot for a single, moderately equipped server. Even without transcoding, that's quite a lot of work for such a CPU. Then, 100k registered users, let's say with 3600 second expiry time, would send you 27 REGISTER messages per second. Plus, most of them will flood you with SIP OPTIONS pings -- even with one ping per minute, you would need to expect 1600 pings per second. So, your CPU would be quite busy with processing SIP messages as well. so, the answer is no. You need to invest into hardware and redundant and distributed architecture. A Kamailio cluster in front of FreeSWITCH would offload most of SIP ping traffic and can do some other jobs. Then, several FreeSWITCH boxes would work in fault-tolerant and load-balancing configuration.... Something like that. It just needs a proper investment and a proper engineering team. On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Antony Aguirre Morales <ing.antonyam@gmail.com> wrote:

I have configured my fs with xml_curl module in the directory part, may serve 100,000 extensions from a single FS or is there any limitation as to the software?

IN the hardware I have a server with the following specifications:

Brand: DELL RAM: 4GB CPU: Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz cores: 4 DD: 50GB

regards.

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org