[freeswitch-users] SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1000@my.domain.com] from [some ip]
Hi, After upgrading to 1.0.7 I am getting WARNING message for every register attempt: [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1000@my.domain.com] from [some ip] Is it OK? If yes, than why it is WARNING and not INFO for example? Thank you, Vitalie
It's logging that a register request is occuring. It's neither succeeded nor failed at this point. It's there to provide enough logging for fail2ban to work with. -Steve On 16 January 2011 09:20, Vitalii Colosov <vetali100@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to 1.0.7 I am getting WARNING message for every register attempt:
[WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1241 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1000@my.domain.com] from [some ip]
Is it OK? If yes, than why it is WARNING and not INFO for example?
Thank you, Vitalie
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
On 16.01.2011 10:28, Steven Ayre wrote:
It's logging that a register request is occuring. It's neither succeeded nor failed at this point.
It's there to provide enough logging for fail2ban to work with.
I've also stumbled upon this. So this is more a INFO than a WARNING? why not chaning it to INFO? - Thomas
I think that's so that the logging level can be set to warning and fail2ban will still work. It might be nice to have a parameter that enables/disables fail2ban's extra logging though. -Steve On 19 January 2011 15:10, Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch> wrote:
On 16.01.2011 10:28, Steven Ayre wrote:
It's logging that a register request is occuring. It's neither succeeded nor failed at this point.
It's there to provide enough logging for fail2ban to work with.
I've also stumbled upon this. So this is more a INFO than a WARNING? why not chaning it to INFO?
- Thomas
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Its at warning so you can have you loglevel set lower and still catch it.. info will be too high for some people if you have a really busy system. Warning is level 4 and Info is level 6. /b On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Steven Ayre wrote:
I think that's so that the logging level can be set to warning and fail2ban will still work. It might be nice to have a parameter that enables/disables fail2ban's extra logging though.
-Steve
participants (4)
-
Brian West
-
Steven Ayre
-
Thomas Mueller
-
Vitalii Colosov