All this really means is a stack can claim to be RFC7007 compliant without being RFC3551 complaint by not supporting DVI4. Equally, RFC3551 compliance implies RFC7007 compliance because there are no additions. On 4 September 2013 16:59, Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> wrote:

Darn it. We added the DVI ADPCM codec to FS, just so we could say we are one of the very very few RTP platforms which are actually RFC3551 compliant, and now RFC7007 has removed the requirement.

Steve

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- *Andrew Cassidy BSc (Hons) MBCS SSCA* Managing Director *T <info@cassidywebservices.co.uk> *03300 100 960 *F<info@cassidywebservices.co.uk> *03300 100 961 *E <info@cassidywebservices.co.uk> *andrew@cassidywebservices.co.uk *W <info@cassidywebservices.co.uk> *www.cassidywebservices.co.uk