Contact Header Modification
Is it possible to modify the contact header such that it is the caller id? I noticed sip_contact_user but it does not seen to effect the outbound leg of the call. The documentation specifically mentions that it is only for the internal SIP contact so I don't believe it does what I was hoping it would. I know you are able to set it to a static value, but I was hoping to be able to set it on a call per call basis. Thanks
So you want to change the contact part on an outbound invite? can you elaborate on WHY? /b On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Roger Salloum wrote:
Is it possible to modify the contact header such that it is the caller id? I noticed sip_contact_user but it does not seen to effect the outbound leg of the call. The documentation specifically mentions that it is only for the internal SIP contact so I don't believe it does what I was hoping it would. I know you are able to set it to a static value, but I was hoping to be able to set it on a call per call basis.
Thanks
Perhaps what you're looking for is the following gateway param: <param name="extension-in-contact" value="true"/> David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. Le 09/07/2010 à 05:03, Roger Salloum a écrit :
Is it possible to modify the contact header such that it is the caller id? I noticed sip_contact_user but it does not seen to effect the outbound leg of the call. The documentation specifically mentions that it is only for the internal SIP contact so I don't believe it does what I was hoping it would. I know you are able to set it to a static value, but I was hoping to be able to set it on a call per call basis.
Thanks _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Any provider, hardware, software that requires specific things in the contact header is broken. Its your contact header not theirs to dictate. /b On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:39 AM, David Ponzone wrote:
Perhaps what you're looking for is the following gateway param:
<param name="extension-in-contact" value="true"/>
David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34
Brian, you know that SIP is all broken anyway :) David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. Le 09/07/2010 à 15:33, Brian West a écrit :
Any provider, hardware, software that requires specific things in the contact header is broken. Its your contact header not theirs to dictate.
/b
On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:39 AM, David Ponzone wrote:
Perhaps what you're looking for is the following gateway param:
<param name="extension-in-contact" value="true"/>
David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Sip in general isn't that badly broken... its humans that misinterpret the spec in their own quirky ways that makes sip suck at times... if the RFC had come with a working implementation to test against this would have never happened. /b On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:42 AM, David Ponzone wrote:
Brian,
you know that SIP is all broken anyway :)
participants (3)
-
Brian West
-
David Ponzone
-
Roger Salloum