Easy Information Needed For Placement Of POP To Avoid Latency
Hi, I am weak in network architecture and need help in placement of POP. Please see below: 1) Is it must to have a POP close to where your subsicriber base. For Example: If my user base is in Australia as well, Will they be affected if their calls are routed through POP in New York as it might cause Latency and packet delay thereby dropping call quality considerably? 2) I have seen some termination providers who have indirect route. Does this mean if i choose them my calls will be routed through multiple switches at multiple locations which will give poor quality voice and also high Latency and Packet Delay? So is it better choose direct routes? Please guide on this. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Easy-Information-Needed-For-Placement-Of-POP-To-Avoid-... Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
you are 100% correct... you do not want your traffic routed through the US if your users are in Australia. also you are always better to choose a provider with the shortest path to you ( most direct ) because of latency, packet loss and jitter. <shameless plug> if your users truly are in Australia you should select the BEST SIP trunking provider in Australia. http://netsip.com.au/ We are also supporters and users of Freeswitch, so you also help the community by signing up with us :) </shameless plug> On 10 September 2012 16:09, TamurlangClan <TamurlangClan@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am weak in network architecture and need help in placement of POP. Please see below:
1) Is it must to have a POP close to where your subsicriber base. For Example: If my user base is in Australia as well, Will they be affected if their calls are routed through POP in New York as it might cause Latency and packet delay thereby dropping call quality considerably?
2) I have seen some termination providers who have indirect route. Does this mean if i choose them my calls will be routed through multiple switches at multiple locations which will give poor quality voice and also high Latency and Packet Delay? So is it better choose direct routes?
Please guide on this. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Easy-Information-Needed-For-Placement-Of-POP-To-Avoid-... Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sincerely Jay
Thanks alot. Yeah sure, I will explore your services :). On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM, jay binks <jaybinks@gmail.com> wrote:
you are 100% correct... you do not want your traffic routed through the US if your users are in Australia.
also you are always better to choose a provider with the shortest path to you ( most direct ) because of latency, packet loss and jitter.
<shameless plug> if your users truly are in Australia you should select the BEST SIP trunking provider in Australia. http://netsip.com.au/
We are also supporters and users of Freeswitch, so you also help the community by signing up with us :) </shameless plug>
On 10 September 2012 16:09, TamurlangClan <TamurlangClan@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am weak in network architecture and need help in placement of POP. Please see below:
1) Is it must to have a POP close to where your subsicriber base. For Example: If my user base is in Australia as well, Will they be affected if their calls are routed through POP in New York as it might cause Latency and packet delay thereby dropping call quality considerably?
2) I have seen some termination providers who have indirect route. Does this mean if i choose them my calls will be routed through multiple switches at multiple locations which will give poor quality voice and also high Latency and Packet Delay? So is it better choose direct routes?
Please guide on this. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Easy-Information-Needed-For-Placement-Of-POP-To-Avoid-... Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sincerely
Jay
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (3)
-
jay binks
-
Tamurlang Clan
-
TamurlangClan