All, I am attempting to allow a single line (1005) to be called which simultaneously allows multiple threads (lines 1006 and 1007) to apply simultaneous IVR. I would thing such grouping is common. Using the below it appears that line 1005 will not bridge to 1006 and 1007 since they are in the dialplan but not registered. Yet 1006 and 1007 can be called directly without being registered. Can this bridge be accomplished without them being registered? If such bridging is not allowed in the dialplan is there a better way? The two errors FS errors are: [ERR] switch_ivr_originate.c:951 switch_ivr_originate() Cannot create outgoing channel of type [sofia] cause: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED <extension name="1005"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^1005$"> <action application="bridge" data="sofia/internal/1006% 192.168.1.222,sofia/internal/1007%192.168.1.222"/> </condition> </extension> <extension name="1006"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^1006$"> <action application="answer"/> <action application="sleep" data="1000"/> <action application="ivr" data="demo_ivr"/> </condition> </extension> <extension name="1007"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^1007$"> <action application="answer"/> <action application="sleep" data="1000"/> <action application="ivr" data="demo_ivr"/> </condition> </extension> Thanks, Bob
They aren't calling via FreeSWITCH I suspect. They'll have to be registered to FreeSWITCH for any call to originate from FreeSWITCH to the phone. /b On Aug 28, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Robert Clayton wrote:
Yet 1006 and 1007 can be called directly without being registered.
Brian West sip:brian@freeswitch.org
participants (2)
-
Brian West
-
Robert Clayton