How to send a SIP MESSAGE request to an unregistered user?
When two users have registered themselves with FS, either user can send a SIP SIMPLE MESSAGE request to the other via FS. For example, Alice and Bob are both registered so Alice can send a message to Bob and vice versa. However, my use-case is slightly different. Only Alice is registered; Bob is a device at some unknown location on the internet on a NATed network behind a firewall/gateway. Bob is able to send a SIP MESSAGE request to Alice@Domain.com and it will be received by FS then forwarded to Alice. My question is how can Alice get a reply MESSAGE back to Bob when he hasn't registered? By default, if Alice tries to reply to Bob@Domain.com, FS will send back a 202/Accepted to Alice, but the message will go nowhere. Given that when Bob sends his message to Alice, the source address of his message will be valid for a short period (therefore the source address is the return address), how can I ensure that when Alice sends a reply MESSAGE a second or two later, it gets to Bob? My initial thought was to somehow auto-register Bob in FS using the source address of his message. Then Alice's reply should get there. Is this possible? Or should Alice's reply be sent another way? I think the reply to Bob must come from the same address to which he sent his message. Some additional info: Alice never initiates a conversation to Bob, but will always send one reply message to any message from Bob. Bob actually represents up to a few thousand devices at various locations on the internet. These devices may send a single unsolicited message at any time and expect a reply message within a few seconds. --- I also tried to do this with Kamailio, but couldn't find a way to auto-register Bob - or save his location in the location db - in order to send back a reply (and Kamailio returns a 404 to Alice rather than 202).
Is bob registered with some other registrar? If yes, Alice's sip client can send the message to bob's address of record( bob@his_domain.com) Alice's registrar does not need to be involved. On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 4:21 PM David R <davidr201901@outlook.com> wrote:
When two users have registered themselves with FS, either user can send a SIP SIMPLE MESSAGE request to the other via FS.
For example, Alice and Bob are both registered so Alice can send a message to Bob and vice versa.
However, my use-case is slightly different. Only Alice is registered; Bob is a device at some unknown location on the internet on a NATed network behind a firewall/gateway.
Bob is able to send a SIP MESSAGE request to Alice@Domain.com and it will be received by FS then forwarded to Alice.
My question is how can Alice get a reply MESSAGE back to Bob when he hasn't registered? By default, if Alice tries to reply to Bob@Domain.com, FS will send back a 202/Accepted to Alice, but the message will go nowhere.
Given that when Bob sends his message to Alice, the source address of his message will be valid for a short period (therefore the source address is the return address), how can I ensure that when Alice sends a reply MESSAGE a second or two later, it gets to Bob?
My initial thought was to somehow auto-register Bob in FS using the source address of his message. Then Alice's reply should get there. Is this possible? Or should Alice's reply be sent another way? I think the reply to Bob must come from the same address to which he sent his message.
Some additional info:
Alice never initiates a conversation to Bob, but will always send one reply message to any message from Bob.
Bob actually represents up to a few thousand devices at various locations on the internet. These devices may send a single unsolicited message at any time and expect a reply message within a few seconds.
---
I also tried to do this with Kamailio, but couldn't find a way to auto-register Bob - or save his location in the location db - in order to send back a reply (and Kamailio returns a 404 to Alice rather than 202).
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
-- Sincerely, Russell Treleaven sip:rtreleaven@sip.bunnykick.ca;transport=tcp
In Kamailio, did you try with https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.0.x/modules/usrloc.html#idm104784018... ? On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 22:36, Russell Treleaven <rtreleaven@bunnykick.ca> wrote:
Is bob registered with some other registrar? If yes, Alice's sip client can send the message to bob's address of record( bob@his_domain.com) Alice's registrar does not need to be involved.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 4:21 PM David R <davidr201901@outlook.com> wrote:
When two users have registered themselves with FS, either user can send a SIP SIMPLE MESSAGE request to the other via FS.
For example, Alice and Bob are both registered so Alice can send a message to Bob and vice versa.
However, my use-case is slightly different. Only Alice is registered; Bob is a device at some unknown location on the internet on a NATed network behind a firewall/gateway.
Bob is able to send a SIP MESSAGE request to Alice@Domain.com and it will be received by FS then forwarded to Alice.
My question is how can Alice get a reply MESSAGE back to Bob when he hasn't registered? By default, if Alice tries to reply to Bob@Domain.com, FS will send back a 202/Accepted to Alice, but the message will go nowhere.
Given that when Bob sends his message to Alice, the source address of his message will be valid for a short period (therefore the source address is the return address), how can I ensure that when Alice sends a reply MESSAGE a second or two later, it gets to Bob?
My initial thought was to somehow auto-register Bob in FS using the source address of his message. Then Alice's reply should get there. Is this possible? Or should Alice's reply be sent another way? I think the reply to Bob must come from the same address to which he sent his message.
Some additional info:
Alice never initiates a conversation to Bob, but will always send one reply message to any message from Bob.
Bob actually represents up to a few thousand devices at various locations on the internet. These devices may send a single unsolicited message at any time and expect a reply message within a few seconds.
---
I also tried to do this with Kamailio, but couldn't find a way to auto-register Bob - or save his location in the location db - in order to send back a reply (and Kamailio returns a 404 to Alice rather than 202).
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
-- Sincerely,
Russell Treleaven sip:rtreleaven@sip.bunnykick.ca;transport=tcp
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com
-- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337
participants (3)
-
David R
-
David Villasmil
-
Russell Treleaven