-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, sorry if you're getting this again, I'm not sure if this mail got deliverd to the mail-list (I didn't get a copy...) Anyway, I want to use bgdial command to add a person to a already started conference (that is, call that person and when answered - add the channel to conference). The scenario is I have two sip clients registered in default context - 1000 and 1001. 1000 dials conference number (3001 in this case) and new conference is started. I want to dial out to second using bgdial, unfortunately mod_sofia drops the call with 'Cannot Blind Transfer 1 Legged calls' message. Should I use the bgdial command differently? Or perhaps I should do this totally differently? Logs attached below. Thanks for any help, Lukasz freeswitch@Zwierko-laptop> conference list API CALL [conference(list)] output: Conference 3001-192.168.0.1 (1 member) 3;sofia/internal/1000@192.168.0.1;25f125a5-3556-a449-85ec-e4001336f313;1000;1000;hear|speak|floor;0;0;300 freeswitch@Zwierko-laptop> conference 3001-192.168.0.1 bgdial sofia/default/1001@192.168.0.1 API CALL [conference(3001-192.168.0.1 bgdial sofia/default/1001@192.168.0.1)] output: OK freeswitch@Zwierko-laptop> 2009-07-19 13:19:44.451100 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:602 New Channel sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1 [b9fada7f-9c1d-4949-af8a-a8220ce f9c5b] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.459100 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:602 New Channel sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1 [4f6b26dd-a0cb-2846-ad17-5f517e60e2e7] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.488100 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:252 Processing TelkaSwitch->1001 in context public 2009-07-19 13:19:44.495100 [ERR] sofia.c:4174 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 Legged calls 2009-07-19 13:19:44.498100 [NOTICE] sofia.c:3775 Hangup sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1 [CS_CONSUME_MEDIA] [NO_USER_RESPONSE] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.501100 [ERR] mod_conference.c:4351 Cannot create outgoing channel, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE 2009-07-19 13:19:44.512100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1085 Session 9 (sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1) Ended 2009-07-19 13:19:44.512100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1087 Close Channel sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1 [CS_DESTROY] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.628100 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:179 Hangup sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1 [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.708100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1085 Session 10 (sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1) Ended 2009-07-19 13:19:44.708100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1087 Close Channel sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1 [CS_DESTROY] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKY3/FAAoJED7LBosr0F2uWo8H/iJEHblsAENCjRh/dsZvj9br Mq6txy7iafLE970XxvToaa0+FGBFxN+S6yQ6ampNPd8t+jl6WwC79Btwr+NLgXEc NcWpVQp65QxKxA+MgQOyqWIskcMcxdf4Uht3wuLPZtre0BpjcAFhykweYjOy1jFp AYAM61ShogHlpXtl9Z6upDvWPoOzdY4m13EM7f0NmpbC32Sg+OOULEtsxvSkZ8ah DBKDyDdXFo9iIcReDqjsu/kzAgrBsAZvOiEbSPoQTjZgzX+UrbgqIc+rhmP60vyt 8u8ufDgzh7MC/VQObHKHLe8e/Zbpaf+3JiGxZBtFyoUFyP3DjHoR5TYu5IsENPU= =QlRU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If a single leg call gets a 302 you can't really "transfer" it anywhere... What SVN rev are you on? /b On Jul 19, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Łukasz Zwierko wrote:
Hi,
sorry if you're getting this again, I'm not sure if this mail got deliverd to the mail-list (I didn't get a copy...)
Anyway,
I want to use bgdial command to add a person to a already started conference (that is, call that person and when answered - add the channel to conference).
The scenario is I have two sip clients registered in default context - 1000 and 1001. 1000 dials conference number (3001 in this case) and new conference is started. I want to dial out to second using bgdial, unfortunately mod_sofia drops the call with 'Cannot Blind Transfer 1 Legged calls' message.
Should I use the bgdial command differently? Or perhaps I should do this totally differently? Logs attached below.
Thanks for any help,
Lukasz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian, I've just updated to 14310 and it's the same. The thing seems that sofia module rejects the call in quite early stage, so there is no 302 answer from remote SIP peer (as no INVITE was sent). Again, I'm exercising a very simple scenario with default FS configuration (just downloaded from svn), so I don't really know what's wrong here... Perhaps there is a different way to attach a call to a existing conference? Perhaps I should just originate new call (with the 'originate' command), and when received, pass it it conference application with the conference-id of the conference that I want to attach it to? Does that make any sense? Thanks Ł freeswitch@Zwierko-laptop> conference list API CALL [conference(list)] output: Conference 3001-192.168.0.1 (1 member) 3;sofia/internal/1000@192.168.0.1;25f125a5-3556-a449-85ec-e4001336f313;1000;1000;hear|speak|floor;0;0;300 freeswitch@Zwierko-laptop> conference 3001-192.168.0.1 bgdial sofia/default/1001@192.168.0.1 API CALL [conference(3001-192.168.0.1 bgdial sofia/default/1001@192.168.0.1)] output: OK freeswitch@Zwierko-laptop> 2009-07-19 13:19:44.451100 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:602 New Channel sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1 [b9fada7f-9c1d-4949-af8a-a8220ce f9c5b] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.459100 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:602 New Channel sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1 [4f6b26dd-a0cb-2846-ad17-5f517e60e2e7] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.488100 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:252 Processing TelkaSwitch->1001 in context public 2009-07-19 13:19:44.495100 [ERR] sofia.c:4174 Cannot Blind Transfer 1 Legged calls 2009-07-19 13:19:44.498100 [NOTICE] sofia.c:3775 Hangup sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1 [CS_CONSUME_MEDIA] [NO_USER_RESPONSE] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.501100 [ERR] mod_conference.c:4351 Cannot create outgoing channel, cause: NO_USER_RESPONSE 2009-07-19 13:19:44.512100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1085 Session 9 (sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1) Ended 2009-07-19 13:19:44.512100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1087 Close Channel sofia/internal/1001@192.168.0.1 [CS_DESTROY] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.628100 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:179 Hangup sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1 [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING] 2009-07-19 13:19:44.708100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1085 Session 10 (sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1) Ended 2009-07-19 13:19:44.708100 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1087 Close Channel sofia/internal/48228882211@192.168.0.1 [CS_DESTROY] Brian West wrote:
If a single leg call gets a 302 you can't really "transfer" it anywhere... What SVN rev are you on?
/b
On Jul 19, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Łukasz Zwierko wrote:
Hi,
sorry if you're getting this again, I'm not sure if this mail got deliverd to the mail-list (I didn't get a copy...)
Anyway,
I want to use bgdial command to add a person to a already started conference (that is, call that person and when answered - add the channel to conference).
The scenario is I have two sip clients registered in default context - 1000 and 1001. 1000 dials conference number (3001 in this case) and new conference is started. I want to dial out to second using bgdial, unfortunately mod_sofia drops the call with 'Cannot Blind Transfer 1 Legged calls' message.
Should I use the bgdial command differently? Or perhaps I should do this totally differently? Logs attached below.
Thanks for any help,
Lukasz
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKZhkZAAoJED7LBosr0F2uE0wIAILk4StkVFGr4QVNsn7dob3d C1UBQnHOPezxlRmyT/lZjeN0Ddw+LZdvC5/Z14V8qjItsar2BDxT65AtVdryaKZq 9wlaEpGCoE377YGKM/k+hi8FYzvTkL1/Oz7aFGW/wpe2gbxKk1YWFSeU13iGpsZV 2byaY0qLdsGrs3CL3XMs69tKHmnnPcdM5p6xSYlOpKeE8/jUNJ+W7cOo0CcmVFf8 Mybwlhq7S7g6cKOD3WqgmBzMJi0pZRBgdz6x6uinAGmiSmTJIWO6+8BNjSIN373U OS7ivn8Gu4Tub50NBhkjhIEM3Kf+2JLQBRkwT0Mr4heIle9ZFe5UWbMFy0g8GbE= =xG/h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Its a 302 on a single leg call right? /b On Jul 21, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Łukasz Zwierko wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Brian,
I've just updated to 14310 and it's the same. The thing seems that sofia module rejects the call in quite early stage, so there is no 302 answer from remote SIP peer (as no INVITE was sent). Again, I'm exercising a very simple scenario with default FS configuration (just downloaded from svn), so I don't really know what's wrong here... Perhaps there is a different way to attach a call to a existing conference? Perhaps I should just originate new call (with the 'originate' command), and when received, pass it it conference application with the conference-id of the conference that I want to attach it to? Does that make any sense?
Thanks
Ł
I'm not sure how this exactly works, but I suppose that it is a single leg call, which upon answer would be attached to the conference (?) somehow. But again, this call does not originate outside FS so what would be the cause for 302? 2009/7/21 Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org>:
Its a 302 on a single leg call right?
/b
On Jul 21, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Łukasz Zwierko wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Brian,
I've just updated to 14310 and it's the same. The thing seems that sofia module rejects the call in quite early stage, so there is no 302 answer from remote SIP peer (as no INVITE was sent). Again, I'm exercising a very simple scenario with default FS configuration (just downloaded from svn), so I don't really know what's wrong here... Perhaps there is a different way to attach a call to a existing conference? Perhaps I should just originate new call (with the 'originate' command), and when received, pass it it conference application with the conference-id of the conference that I want to attach it to? Does that make any sense?
Thanks
Ł
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
The far end you're calling is sending a 302 can you check the sip traffic please. /b On Jul 22, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Łukasz Zwierko wrote:
I'm not sure how this exactly works, but I suppose that it is a single leg call, which upon answer would be attached to the conference (?) somehow. But again, this call does not originate outside FS so what would be the cause for 302?
Ok Brian, you were right after all - I've had my X-lite incorrectly configured, sorry for wasting your time. thanks, LZ W dniu 22 lipca 2009 12:50 użytkownik Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> napisał:
The far end you're calling is sending a 302 can you check the sip traffic please.
/b
On Jul 22, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Łukasz Zwierko wrote:
I'm not sure how this exactly works, but I suppose that it is a single leg call, which upon answer would be attached to the conference (?) somehow. But again, this call does not originate outside FS so what would be the cause for 302?
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (2)
-
Brian West
-
Łukasz Zwierko