new_voip wrote

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *case 1* (does not work) FS(public static IP) <-- internet <--(public IP ) Nat <-- 10.x.x.x (CPE) NAT <-- ATA (192.168.x.x) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is there a reason for a double NAT/Firewall? If no, then remove the additional layer of NAT/Firewall.

----- FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity. -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/wimax-double-nat-tp7024457p702... Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.