No response to registration requests with high port numbers?
Hi, Got a problem with a handset that doesn't seem to be registering on our Freeswitch server. The diagnostics from a member of Cisco support said... "At packet 422 we see the phone "0_4147057716@192.168.40.26" send a registration request to 5.9.36.113:5060 from 175.159.77.82:32060 - We do not see a reply to this from the SIP provider. We responses to requests from 0_359240637@192.168.40.26 <mailto:0_359240637@192.168.40.26> with source port 5060, which suggests to me that the SIP provider is not replying to the high UDP port requests. As the MX is a NAT device, subsequent SIP requests will always have a high UDP port." I'm not sure where we might configure acceptable ranges of SIP source or if it's something else. Thanks for any suggestions... Alex
we have no filters like that, sounds like a network path issue. /b On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Alex Lake <alex@digitalmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Got a problem with a handset that doesn't seem to be registering on our Freeswitch server. The diagnostics from a member of Cisco support said...
"At packet 422 we see the phone "0_4147057716@192.168.40.26" <0_4147057716@192.168.40.26> send a registration request to 5.9.36.113:5060 from 175.159.77.82:32060 - We do not see a reply to this from the SIP provider.
We responses to requests from 0_359240637@192.168.40.26 with source port 5060, which suggests to me that the SIP provider is not replying to the high UDP port requests. As the MX is a NAT device, subsequent SIP requests will always have a high UDP port."
I'm not sure where we might configure acceptable ranges of SIP source or if it's something else.
Thanks for any suggestions...
Alex
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Brian West | Co-founder and Developer Need Commercial support? email sales@freeswitch.com FreeSWITCH Solutions | 17345 Civic Drive #2531 Brookfield, WI 53045 <https://maps.google.com/?q=17345+Civic+Drive+%232531+Brookfield,+WI+53045&entry=gmail&source=g> Email: brian@freeswitch.com Mobile: 918-424-9378 Website: https://www.FreeSWITCH.com <https://www.freeswitch.com/> [image: color-facebook-96.png] <https://www.facebook.com/freeswitch/>[image: color-twitter-96.png] <https://twitter.com/freeswitch?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
Is your profile listening on port 32060 <http://175.159.77.82:32060/> ? you can run on the cli "sofia status profile [your-profile]" and you will get a response including your URL which should include the port number. You can also run: netstat -putan if you're on debian, that should show the ports in use, and freeswitch should show up there. also, you can use ngrep: ngrep -qW byline port 32060 and that would show ANY packet coming and going to that port... - if you see the responses going out and they don't, there's a problem on the path and someone is blocking it. - if you don't see ANY request coming in from your client's IP, the someone is blocking it. hope this helps ᐧ Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.com> wrote:
we have no filters like that, sounds like a network path issue.
/b
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Alex Lake <alex@digitalmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Got a problem with a handset that doesn't seem to be registering on our Freeswitch server. The diagnostics from a member of Cisco support said...
"At packet 422 we see the phone "0_4147057716@192.168.40.26" <0_4147057716@192.168.40.26> send a registration request to 5.9.36.113:5060 from 175.159.77.82:32060 - We do not see a reply to this from the SIP provider.
We responses to requests from 0_359240637@192.168.40.26 with source port 5060, which suggests to me that the SIP provider is not replying to the high UDP port requests. As the MX is a NAT device, subsequent SIP requests will always have a high UDP port."
I'm not sure where we might configure acceptable ranges of SIP source or if it's something else.
Thanks for any suggestions...
Alex
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Brian West | Co-founder and Developer
Need Commercial support? email sales@freeswitch.com
FreeSWITCH Solutions | 17345 Civic Drive #2531 Brookfield, WI 53045 <https://maps.google.com/?q=17345+Civic+Drive+%232531+Brookfield,+WI+53045&entry=gmail&source=g>
Email: brian@freeswitch.com
Mobile: 918-424-9378 <(918)%20424-9378>
Website: https://www.FreeSWITCH.com <https://www.freeswitch.com/>
[image: color-facebook-96.png] <https://www.facebook.com/freeswitch/>[image: color-twitter-96.png] <https://twitter.com/freeswitch?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I'm beginning to think that this high port number thing is a red herring. The router in question is a Meraki and it seems to have trouble allowing more than one SIP client to register with freeswitch (maybe a NAT/ALG issue)- is this some kind of FAQ? On 11/01/2018 15:47, Alex Lake wrote:
Hi,
Got a problem with a handset that doesn't seem to be registering on our Freeswitch server. The diagnostics from a member of Cisco support said...
"At packet 422 we see the phone "0_4147057716@192.168.40.26" send a registration request to 5.9.36.113:5060 from 175.159.77.82:32060 - We do not see a reply to this from the SIP provider.
We responses to requests from 0_359240637@192.168.40.26 <mailto:0_359240637@192.168.40.26> with source port 5060, which suggests to me that the SIP provider is not replying to the high UDP port requests. As the MX is a NAT device, subsequent SIP requests will always have a high UDP port."
I'm not sure where we might configure acceptable ranges of SIP source or if it's something else.
Thanks for any suggestions...
Alex
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
AFAIK, Meraki does not have a SIP/ALG. Did you check for any FW or IDS policy that could affect the SIP flows ? Did you check the logs from the FW/IDS to see if packets are rejected ? On the FS side, you could try adding: <variable name="sip-force-contact" value="NDLB-connectile-dysfunction"/> or <variable name="sip-force-contact" value="NDLB-connectile-dysfunction-2.0"/> in the user account. Le 15 janv. 2018 à 11:46, Alex Lake a écrit :
I'm beginning to think that this high port number thing is a red herring. The router in question is a Meraki and it seems to have trouble allowing more than one SIP client to register with freeswitch (maybe a NAT/ALG issue)- is this some kind of FAQ?
On 11/01/2018 15:47, Alex Lake wrote:
Hi,
Got a problem with a handset that doesn't seem to be registering on our Freeswitch server. The diagnostics from a member of Cisco support said...
"At packet 422 we see the phone "0_4147057716@192.168.40.26" send a registration request to 5.9.36.113:5060 from 175.159.77.82:32060 - We do not see a reply to this from the SIP provider.
We responses to requests from 0_359240637@192.168.40.26 with source port 5060, which suggests to me that the SIP provider is not replying to the high UDP port requests. As the MX is a NAT device, subsequent SIP requests will always have a high UDP port."
I'm not sure where we might configure acceptable ranges of SIP source or if it's something else.
Thanks for any suggestions...
Alex
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Try to set the local port of the SIP device to something else than 5060 (15060). Routers with NAT often change the outgoing SIP port during NAT (e.g. if 5060 is already used by another device). Sometimes (PfSense) they are even puzzling the port by default for security reasons, which cause similar problems as you describe. Best regards Peter On 01/15/18 11:46, Alex Lake wrote:
I'm beginning to think that this high port number thing is a red herring. The router in question is a Meraki and it seems to have trouble allowing more than one SIP client to register with freeswitch (maybe a NAT/ALG issue)- is this some kind of FAQ?
On 11/01/2018 15:47, Alex Lake wrote:
Hi,
Got a problem with a handset that doesn't seem to be registering on our Freeswitch server. The diagnostics from a member of Cisco support said...
"At packet 422 we see the phone "0_4147057716@192.168.40.26" send a registration request to 5.9.36.113:5060 from 175.159.77.82:32060 - We do not see a reply to this from the SIP provider.
We responses to requests from 0_359240637@192.168.40.26 <mailto:0_359240637@192.168.40.26> with source port 5060, which suggests to me that the SIP provider is not replying to the high UDP port requests. As the MX is a NAT device, subsequent SIP requests will always have a high UDP port."
I'm not sure where we might configure acceptable ranges of SIP source or if it's something else.
Thanks for any suggestions...
Alex
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- With kind regards Peter Steinbach Telefaks Services GmbH mailto:lists (att) telefaks.de Internet: www.telefaks.de
participants (5)
-
Alex Lake
-
Brian West
-
David Ponzone
-
David Villasmil
-
Peter Steinbach