Hi Gregor, Thanks for quick reply. We have sip_registration table for shared database between two freeswitch servers. But there is no entry of registered verto user in that table. We have two freeswitch servers 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11. Now if we register one user(1000) on .10 and run freeswitch@internal> verto_contact 1000@192.168.1.10 freeswitch@internal> verto.rtc/u:74a87202-c5cc-88ad-c6b7-593dbd7s4w8g it shows as registered. But when we run same command on .11 it says error/user_not_registered.We want to share the registration between two freeswitch. -- Thanks, Rutu Patel <http://www.inextrix.com> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Gregor Nanger <gregor@infomedia.si> wrote:

We are using using xml_curl for sharing registrations and it works also with mod_verto.

I think it should also work in your scenario. Registration is registration, it doesn't matter where it comes.

Do you have problems with your scenario?

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016, 06:46 Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com> wrote:

...

Hi,

We are using 2 freeswitch servers with mod_verto implemented.

We have web client verto demo on different server than freeswitch server.

For sofia registrations we use shared database using odbc connection.

Is it possible to use shared database concept with verto registration or is there any other way to achieve this ? -- Thanks, Rutu Patel <http://www.inextrix.com> _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- Gregor Nanger

*CTO* t./f.: 00386 (0) 7 6000 308/309 • m:. 00386 (0)41 756485 • Infomedia d.o.o. • Jerebova 3, Novo mesto, Slovenia • www.infomedia.si

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

As Verto is not SIP, would Verto registrations even appear in the sip_registration table? Perhaps you are using or looking in the wrong table? --- Bote FreeSWITCH Docs Janitor <http://freeswitch.org/confluence> http://freeswitch.org/confluence From: Rutu Patel Sent: Monday, 28 March, 2016 03:06 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Verto client on different server than freeswitch Can anyone please assist for shared connection of verto users ? -- Thanks, Rutu Patel On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com> wrote: Hi Gregor, Thanks for quick reply. We have sip_registration table for shared database between two freeswitch servers. But there is no entry of registered verto user in that table. We have two freeswitch servers 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11. Now if we register one user(1000) on .10 and run freeswitch@internal> verto_contact 1000@192.168.1.10 freeswitch@internal> verto.rtc/u:74a87202-c5cc-88ad-c6b7-593dbd7s4w8g it shows as registered. But when we run same command on .11 it says error/user_not_registered.We want to share the registration between two freeswitch. -- Thanks, Rutu Patel On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Gregor Nanger <gregor@infomedia.si> wrote: We are using using xml_curl for sharing registrations and it works also with mod_verto. I think it should also work in your scenario. Registration is registration, it doesn't matter where it comes. Do you have problems with your scenario? On Sat, Mar 26, 2016, 06:46 Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com> wrote: Hi, We are using 2 freeswitch servers with mod_verto implemented. We have web client verto demo on different server than freeswitch server. For sofia registrations we use shared database using odbc connection. Is it possible to use shared database concept with verto registration or is there any other way to achieve this ? -- Thanks, Rutu Patel

Like sip over websockets, calls back to a registered verto endpoint must be done on the server that receives the registration as it must be made over the open websockets. On Monday, March 28, 2016, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com> wrote:

Hi Bote,

Is there any way to share verto registration as we can do with SIP registrations ?

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

<http://www.inextrix.com>

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Bote Man <bote_radio@botecomm.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bote_radio@botecomm.com');>> wrote:

...

As Verto is not SIP, would Verto registrations even appear in the sip_registration table?

Perhaps you are using or looking in the wrong table?

---

Bote

FreeSWITCH Docs Janitor

http://freeswitch.org/confluence

*From:* Rutu Patel *Sent:* Monday, 28 March, 2016 03:06 *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Verto client on different server than freeswitch

Can anyone please assist for shared connection of verto users ?

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rutu.patel@inextrix.com');>> wrote:

Hi Gregor,

Thanks for quick reply.

We have sip_registration table for shared database between two freeswitch servers.

But there is no entry of registered verto user in that table.

We have two freeswitch servers 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11.

Now if we register one user(1000) on .10 and run

freeswitch@internal> verto_contact 1000@192.168.1.10 <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','1000@192.168.1.10');> freeswitch@internal> verto.rtc/u:74a87202-c5cc-88ad-c6b7-593dbd7s4w8g

it shows as registered.

But when we run same command on .11 it says error/user_not_registered.We want to share the registration between two freeswitch.

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Gregor Nanger <gregor@infomedia.si <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gregor@infomedia.si');>> wrote:

We are using using xml_curl for sharing registrations and it works also with mod_verto.

I think it should also work in your scenario. Registration is registration, it doesn't matter where it comes.

Do you have problems with your scenario?

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016, 06:46 Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rutu.patel@inextrix.com');>> wrote:

Hi,

We are using 2 freeswitch servers with mod_verto implemented.

We have web client verto demo on different server than freeswitch server.

For sofia registrations we use shared database using odbc connection.

Is it possible to use shared database concept with verto registration or is there any other way to achieve this ?

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','consulting@freeswitch.org');> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org');> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

You can not share a socket connection between multiple servers. That's not how sockets work. Because of that, neither sip over websockets or verto registrations can be shared, you need to send the call through the server it's registered to in order to reach the client. On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com> wrote:

Hi Michael,

Thanks for reply.

Can you please elaborate little how can shared registration work with mod_verto for multiple freeswitch servers ?

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike@jerris.com');>> wrote:

...

Like sip over websockets, calls back to a registered verto endpoint must be done on the server that receives the registration as it must be made over the open websockets.

On Monday, March 28, 2016, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rutu.patel@inextrix.com');>> wrote:

...

Hi Bote,

Is there any way to share verto registration as we can do with SIP registrations ?

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

<http://www.inextrix.com>

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Bote Man <bote_radio@botecomm.com> wrote:

...

As Verto is not SIP, would Verto registrations even appear in the sip_registration table?

Perhaps you are using or looking in the wrong table?

---

Bote

FreeSWITCH Docs Janitor

http://freeswitch.org/confluence

*From:* Rutu Patel *Sent:* Monday, 28 March, 2016 03:06 *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Verto client on different server than freeswitch

Can anyone please assist for shared connection of verto users ?

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com> wrote:

Hi Gregor,

Thanks for quick reply.

We have sip_registration table for shared database between two freeswitch servers.

But there is no entry of registered verto user in that table.

We have two freeswitch servers 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11.

Now if we register one user(1000) on .10 and run

freeswitch@internal> verto_contact 1000@192.168.1.10 freeswitch@internal> verto.rtc/u:74a87202-c5cc-88ad-c6b7-593dbd7s4w8g

it shows as registered.

But when we run same command on .11 it says error/user_not_registered.We want to share the registration between two freeswitch.

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Gregor Nanger <gregor@infomedia.si> wrote:

We are using using xml_curl for sharing registrations and it works also with mod_verto.

I think it should also work in your scenario. Registration is registration, it doesn't matter where it comes.

Do you have problems with your scenario?

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016, 06:46 Rutu Patel <rutu.patel@inextrix.com> wrote:

Hi,

We are using 2 freeswitch servers with mod_verto implemented.

We have web client verto demo on different server than freeswitch server.

For sofia registrations we use shared database using odbc connection.

Is it possible to use shared database concept with verto registration or is there any other way to achieve this ?

-- Thanks, Rutu Patel

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','consulting@freeswitch.org');> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org');> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org