The first reINVITE with inactive looks like a hold, the second reINVITE without SDP looks like a resume, what is the third reINVITE for? Does FS receive ACK for the third reINVITE? I think if FS returns sendonly for reINVITE without SDP, FS will not receive BYE. /Kaiduan On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 08:14:08 a.m. EDT, Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com> wrote: Hello,   No idea?   Regards,   Igor. Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 16:44, Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com> a écrit : Hi!   I cannot figure out why my call is disconnected in this scenario: UA1 --> FS --> GW --> UA2 (I think it’s a Cisco Phone and/or CUCM)   UA2 sends a first RE-INVITE with media attribute "inactive". FS is replying with 200 OK inactive. Then, UA2 sends a second RE-INVITE without SDP. FS is replying with 200 OK inactive. Then, UA2 sends a third RE-INVITE without SDP. FS is replying with 200 OK inactive. And just a couple of ms after, FS sends the BYE with 488 No answer to offer.   Do you have any idea of the origin?   Regards,   Igor. _________________________________________________________________________ The FreeSWITCH project is sponsored by SignalWire https://signalwire.com Enhance your FreeSWITCH install with disruptive priced SMS and PSTN services. Build your next product on our scalable cloud platform. Join our online community to chat in real time https://signalwire.community Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com

Can you paste all SIP messages please? /Kaiduan On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 11:46:20 a.m. EDT, Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, Thank you for your answers. I could move forward with sip_unhold_nosdp=true so now FS replies with the initial proposal in 200 OK when an INVITE without SDP is received. Now that's the UA2 that sends the BYE...but not clear why yet. Regards, Igor. Le mer. 22 juin 2022 à 14:13, Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com> a écrit : Hello,   No idea?   Regards,   Igor. Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 16:44, Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com> a écrit : Hi!   I cannot figure out why my call is disconnected in this scenario: UA1 --> FS --> GW --> UA2 (I think it’s a Cisco Phone and/or CUCM)   UA2 sends a first RE-INVITE with media attribute "inactive". FS is replying with 200 OK inactive. Then, UA2 sends a second RE-INVITE without SDP. FS is replying with 200 OK inactive. Then, UA2 sends a third RE-INVITE without SDP. FS is replying with 200 OK inactive. And just a couple of ms after, FS sends the BYE with 488 No answer to offer.   Do you have any idea of the origin?   Regards,   Igor. _________________________________________________________________________ The FreeSWITCH project is sponsored by SignalWire https://signalwire.com Enhance your FreeSWITCH install with disruptive priced SMS and PSTN services. Build your next product on our scalable cloud platform. Join our online community to chat in real time https://signalwire.community Professional FreeSWITCH Services sales@freeswitch.com https://freeswitch.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites https://freeswitch.com/oss https://freeswitch.org/confluence https://cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users https://freeswitch.com