Couldn't you fix your client to report the proper IP in the first place? What you're proposing would prevent two FreeSWITCH systems from every talking because neither would send ANYTHING. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:40 PM, JP <jaykris@gmail.com> wrote:

I've observed that FreeSWITCH will initially transmit RTP to the remote party's private IP address until it has received at least 10 packets, at which time it will start sending to the remote party's NATed address. Is there some way to suspend the transmission of RTP altogether until at least one packet has been received from the remote party? It would be ideal if this could be controlled on a per call and/or per SIP profile basis.

Thanks,

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- *Brian West* brian@freeswitch.org *Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest* http://www.freeswitchbook.com http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com ClueCon 2015 Call for Speakers <https://www.cluecon.com/call-for-speakers/> | Register <https://freeswitch.com/cart.php?gid=1> TODAY! | Reddit: /r/freeswitch <https://www.reddit.com/r/freeswitch> *T:*+19184209001 | *F:*+19184209002 | *M:*+1918424WEST (9378) *iNUM:*+883 5100 1420 9001 | *ISN:*410*543 | *Skype:*briankwest