Installing freeswitch on CentOS
Hi, Since CentOS is recommend for FS but i can't see a CentOS specific installation guide on wiki as we have a separate guide for Ubuntu. Do we have similar guide like this one http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SBC_Setup* *actually its for debian but good thing is that it also explains which extra services should be stopped or removed for better performance. Do we have similar for CentOS? Thanks
Since CentOS is recommend for FS but i can't see a CentOS specific installation guide on wiki as we have a separate >guide for Ubuntu.
Do we have similar guide like this one http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SBC_Setup actually its for debian but good thing >is that it also explains which extra >services should be stopped or removed for better performance.
Do we have similar for CentOS?
Check out the http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide
the big rule for the time being is stick with 5.3 5.4 appears to have some bugs in the toolchain and libc On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>wrote:
Since CentOS is recommend for FS but i can't see a CentOS specific installation guide on wiki as we have a separate >guide for Ubuntu.
Do we have similar guide like this one http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SBC_Setup actually its for debian but good thing >is that it also explains which extra >services should be stopped or removed for better performance.
Do we have similar for CentOS?
Check out the http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
the big rule for the time being is stick with 5.3 5.4 appears to have some bugs in the toolchain and libc
OMG, I have been messing with my broken fax and zap for like two weeks? Someone shoot me... Unless you install of a dvd and avoid using public repo's, that's kind of hard? Do you guys have any idea when this could be resolved, I am going to hold off on my migration then. Thanks! jlc
if you get centos5.3 or 5.2 it will be resolved because it's not centos5.4 which is the only bad one atm, newer is not always better. On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>wrote:
the big rule for the time being is stick with 5.3 5.4 appears to have some bugs in the toolchain and libc
OMG, I have been messing with my broken fax and zap for like two weeks? Someone shoot me...
Unless you install of a dvd and avoid using public repo's, that's kind of hard? Do you guys have any idea when this could be resolved, I am going to hold off on my migration then.
Thanks! jlc
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
Personally, I'm migrating to openSUSE, because I'm tired of RedHat's non-standard kernel backports and outdated packages. Others in the VoIP industry (ViciDial) recommend SuSE because of their experience with with RedHat's long-standing perl bug, process preemption set to desktop, version number mismatch on packages and non-standard libraries. But SuSE is not without it's problems. The perl module for FreeSWITCH will compile on SuSE, but FreeSWITCH coredumps when trying to use it. Haven't had time to research that one. Also, if you're going to use wanpipe with Sangoma cards on SuSE, check with Sangoma to make sure wanpipe will compile on 11.2. It wouldn't compile for me and I reported the bug to Sangoma, but I haven't heard anything back yet. Wanpipe compiles just fine on 11.1. Having said that, the Suse installation is very similar to CentOS/RedHat. I've run FreeSWITCH on both, and it works just fine on both. Hope this helps, Bill Anthony Minessale wrote:
the big rule for the time being is stick with 5.3 5.4 appears to have some bugs in the toolchain and libc
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com <mailto:jcasale@activenetwerx.com>> wrote:
>Since CentOS is recommend for FS but i can't see a CentOS specific installation guide on wiki as we have a separate >guide for Ubuntu. > >Do we have similar guide like this one http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SBC_Setup actually its for debian but good thing >is that it also explains which extra >services should be stopped or removed for better performance. > >Do we have similar for CentOS?
Check out the http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <mailto:MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com <mailto:PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <mailto:sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888 <http://iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org <mailto:googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
The last guy using SUSE had filesystem problems so bad he almost cried while he was apologizing for how much time he wasted asking for help about it once he tried a different one. Not to say you can't use whatever you want but we are going to tread carefully about which distros we support. On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bill W. <freeswitch@aastral.net> wrote:
Personally, I'm migrating to openSUSE, because I'm tired of RedHat's non-standard kernel backports and outdated packages.
Others in the VoIP industry (ViciDial) recommend SuSE because of their experience with with RedHat's long-standing perl bug, process preemption set to desktop, version number mismatch on packages and non-standard libraries.
But SuSE is not without it's problems. The perl module for FreeSWITCH will compile on SuSE, but FreeSWITCH coredumps when trying to use it. Haven't had time to research that one.
Also, if you're going to use wanpipe with Sangoma cards on SuSE, check with Sangoma to make sure wanpipe will compile on 11.2. It wouldn't compile for me and I reported the bug to Sangoma, but I haven't heard anything back yet. Wanpipe compiles just fine on 11.1.
Having said that, the Suse installation is very similar to CentOS/RedHat. I've run FreeSWITCH on both, and it works just fine on both.
Hope this helps, Bill
Anthony Minessale wrote:
the big rule for the time being is stick with 5.3 5.4 appears to have some bugs in the toolchain and libc
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com <mailto:jcasale@activenetwerx.com>> wrote:
>Since CentOS is recommend for FS but i can't see a CentOS specific installation guide on wiki as we have a separate >guide for Ubuntu. > >Do we have similar guide like this one http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SBC_Setup actually its for debian but good thing >is that it also explains which extra >services should be stopped or removed for better performance. > >Do we have similar for CentOS?
Check out the http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> <mailto:MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com<MSN%253Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com>
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> <mailto:PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%253Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com>
IRC: irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> <mailto:sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org<sip%253A888@conference.freeswitch.org>
iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888 <http://iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> <mailto:googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%253Aconf%252B888@conference.freeswitch.org>
pstn:+19193869900
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
The last guy using SUSE had filesystem problems so bad he almost cried while he was apologizing for how much time he wasted asking for help about it once he tried a different one. Not to say you can't use whatever you want but we are going to tread carefully about which distros we support.
Which begs the question, which distro do _you_ run on and suggest behind the scenes:)
We use CentOS 5.3 64 bit and have very few issues, The problem is since it's an older kernel there may be some real time improvements we could benefit from so we will probably play with some newer bleeding kernels to compare and stay ahead of the curve but still rely on CentOS to keep the users happy. On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>wrote:
The last guy using SUSE had filesystem problems so bad he almost cried while he was apologizing for how much time he wasted asking for help about it once he tried a different one. Not to say you can't use whatever you want but we are going to tread carefully about which distros we support.
Which begs the question, which distro do _you_ run on and suggest behind the scenes:)
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:
The last guy using SUSE had filesystem problems so bad he almost cried while he was apologizing for how much time he wasted asking for help about it once he tried a different one.
Are they still using reiserfs by default? If I were using Reiserfs (which I'm not, and I'm not using Suse either), I would be moving to EXT3, EXT4, or XFS.
Good luck with that you'll have an ass load of problems. The reason its stable is the backports and outdated packages. Bleeding edge will only screw you over... just ask KJV... He was on OpenSuSE and had nothing but weird problems. /b On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Bill W. wrote:
Personally, I'm migrating to openSUSE, because I'm tired of RedHat's non-standard kernel backports and outdated packages.
Others in the VoIP industry (ViciDial) recommend SuSE because of their experience with with RedHat's long-standing perl bug, process preemption set to desktop, version number mismatch on packages and non-standard libraries.
But SuSE is not without it's problems. The perl module for FreeSWITCH will compile on SuSE, but FreeSWITCH coredumps when trying to use it. Haven't had time to research that one.
Also, if you're going to use wanpipe with Sangoma cards on SuSE, check with Sangoma to make sure wanpipe will compile on 11.2. It wouldn't compile for me and I reported the bug to Sangoma, but I haven't heard anything back yet. Wanpipe compiles just fine on 11.1.
Having said that, the Suse installation is very similar to CentOS/RedHat. I've run FreeSWITCH on both, and it works just fine on both.
Hope this helps, Bill
Wow, I haven't heard of these issues. Obviously this concerns me. Are these documented anywhere so I can research this? How do I get in touch with KJV? Thanks! Bill Brian West wrote:
Good luck with that you'll have an ass load of problems. The reason its stable is the backports and outdated packages. Bleeding edge will only screw you over... just ask KJV... He was on OpenSuSE and had nothing but weird problems.
He's on the list Karl J. Vesterling /b On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Bill W. wrote:
Wow, I haven't heard of these issues. Obviously this concerns me. Are these documented anywhere so I can research this? How do I get in touch with KJV?
Thanks! Bill
Brian West wrote:
Good luck with that you'll have an ass load of problems. The reason its stable is the backports and outdated packages. Bleeding edge will only screw you over... just ask KJV... He was on OpenSuSE and had nothing but weird problems.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Hey Everyone, I spoke with Karl, and for the sake of completing this thread I'm posting the results. Ultimately the problem Karl found with OpenSUSE was the SQLite libraries leading to database corruption, and freeswitch misbehaving because of that. He also was trying to do traffic shaping for his application and ran into problems with shaping not working right on multi-core x86_64 kernels in SuSE. I asked him about using odbc in the core to get around the sqlite bug but he didn't bother because he needed traffic shaping that worked. So it's not so much that SuSE was a bad distro, but rather that it didn't work well with freeswitch and traffic shaping on multi-core x86_64. He did mention that SuSE 11.1 is nice in general but to stay away from 11.2 because gcc segfaults on any significant build. Hope this helps the community! Bill His response: ==================== The big thing you should learn from the investment of my time in the lab here is simply this, "listen to Brian". From now on, I'm considering him the EF Hutton on #freeswitch. (Editors Note: For you youngsters out there, EF Hutton's tagline was "When EF Hutton talks, people listen.") When I added about 60 phones to the system, it essentially "blew up" whereby phones wouldn't register, the database would get corrupted, etc... We worked around the problem by making the freeswitch "db" directory a ramdisk, but that only mitigated the problem, and didn't entirely fix it. Oh yeah, and although mod_perl will compile in freeswitch, it will bomb out and segfault when attempting to run any mod_perl scripts in freeswitch. The fix is to recompile perl from source. Even then, I still had problems. Other problems with the remaining Suse installations still are: 1.) When you answer, it will hang up. No rhyme, reason, or otherwise. 2.) Occasionally (rarely) we have issues with audio not passing through correctly. One way audio, or none at all. 3.) When you dial, it will take 10 seconds to go through enum lookups and the like before finally hitting the PSTN gateway. Oh yeah, about RedHat... Don't bother with it's sister CentOS either. I tested it here in the lab, and it was like getting in a time machine and going back to 2007. Also, Centos is busted. You'll find that Linux kernel will re-transmit IP packets from processes long since dead. Suffice it to say, when it does this to RTP traffic it drives things bugnutz. (Ed. His test was to run 20mbit/sec through centos with a gigabit card overnight and it dropped 150 packets. He did try different cards.) Mandrake - recommend this to people you dislike. If they're ignorant enough you'll find them thanking you for it. Debian - almost awesome, but if failed miserably in the lab with packet shaping. I mean, it thought it was working, but the overall quality was hit & miss. Other than that, no complaints. What was really attractive was it's got Cyrus 2.3 out of the box, so if you're using Cyrus and not using it for packet shaping you might consider Debian an option. Be advised, since it flunked packet shaping we never bothered to compile/test freeswitch on it, so do your own research. Ubuntu, make no mistake... We tested Ubuntu pretty heavily here in the lab. Even the packet shaping works (HTB & SFQ). With Suse I has to custom-compile the kernel, and packet shaping ONLY worked with 2.6.28.8 - 2.6.28.10, the rest were buggy and the problems manifested themselves in ways that you'd think would be totally unrelated. I should be more specific and state x86_64 multi-core. x86_64 single core seemed to do packet shaping (somewhat nicely) in 2.6.18 on up. Previous to that it was rather "interesting"... Save yourself the headache and go with Ubuntu. ================================== Brian West wrote:
He's on the list Karl J. Vesterling
/b
On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Bill W. wrote:
Wow, I haven't heard of these issues. Obviously this concerns me. Are these documented anywhere so I can research this? How do I get in touch with KJV?
Thanks! Bill
Brian West wrote:
Good luck with that you'll have an ass load of problems. The reason its stable is the backports and outdated packages. Bleeding edge will only screw you over... just ask KJV... He was on OpenSuSE and had nothing but weird problems.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Which version of Ubuntu was tested against? It's surprising to find such testing result about CentOS. On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Bill W <freeswitch@aastral.net> wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I spoke with Karl, and for the sake of completing this thread I'm posting the results.
Ultimately the problem Karl found with OpenSUSE was the SQLite libraries leading to database corruption, and freeswitch misbehaving because of that. He also was trying to do traffic shaping for his application and ran into problems with shaping not working right on multi-core x86_64 kernels in SuSE.
I asked him about using odbc in the core to get around the sqlite bug but he didn't bother because he needed traffic shaping that worked.
So it's not so much that SuSE was a bad distro, but rather that it didn't work well with freeswitch and traffic shaping on multi-core x86_64. He did mention that SuSE 11.1 is nice in general but to stay away from 11.2 because gcc segfaults on any significant build.
Hope this helps the community! Bill
His response: ==================== The big thing you should learn from the investment of my time in the lab here is simply this, "listen to Brian". From now on, I'm considering him the EF Hutton on #freeswitch.
(Editors Note: For you youngsters out there, EF Hutton's tagline was "When EF Hutton talks, people listen.")
When I added about 60 phones to the system, it essentially "blew up" whereby phones wouldn't register, the database would get corrupted, etc...
We worked around the problem by making the freeswitch "db" directory a ramdisk, but that only mitigated the problem, and didn't entirely fix it.
Oh yeah, and although mod_perl will compile in freeswitch, it will bomb out and segfault when attempting to run any mod_perl scripts in freeswitch. The fix is to recompile perl from source. Even then, I still had problems.
Other problems with the remaining Suse installations still are:
1.) When you answer, it will hang up. No rhyme, reason, or otherwise. 2.) Occasionally (rarely) we have issues with audio not passing through correctly. One way audio, or none at all. 3.) When you dial, it will take 10 seconds to go through enum lookups and the like before finally hitting the PSTN gateway.
Oh yeah, about RedHat... Don't bother with it's sister CentOS either. I tested it here in the lab, and it was like getting in a time machine and going back to 2007. Also, Centos is busted. You'll find that Linux kernel will re-transmit IP packets from processes long since dead. Suffice it to say, when it does this to RTP traffic it drives things bugnutz. (Ed. His test was to run 20mbit/sec through centos with a gigabit card overnight and it dropped 150 packets. He did try different cards.)
Mandrake - recommend this to people you dislike. If they're ignorant enough you'll find them thanking you for it.
Debian - almost awesome, but if failed miserably in the lab with packet shaping. I mean, it thought it was working, but the overall quality was hit & miss. Other than that, no complaints. What was really attractive was it's got Cyrus 2.3 out of the box, so if you're using Cyrus and not using it for packet shaping you might consider Debian an option. Be advised, since it flunked packet shaping we never bothered to compile/test freeswitch on it, so do your own research.
Ubuntu, make no mistake... We tested Ubuntu pretty heavily here in the lab. Even the packet shaping works (HTB & SFQ). With Suse I has to custom-compile the kernel, and packet shaping ONLY worked with 2.6.28.8 - 2.6.28.10, the rest were buggy and the problems manifested themselves in ways that you'd think would be totally unrelated. I should be more specific and state x86_64 multi-core. x86_64 single core seemed to do packet shaping (somewhat nicely) in 2.6.18 on up. Previous to that it was rather "interesting"...
Save yourself the headache and go with Ubuntu.
==================================
Brian West wrote:
He's on the list Karl J. Vesterling
/b
On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Bill W. wrote:
Wow, I haven't heard of these issues. Obviously this concerns me. Are these documented anywhere so I can research this? How do I get in touch with KJV?
Thanks! Bill
Brian West wrote:
Good luck with that you'll have an ass load of problems. The reason its stable is the backports and outdated packages. Bleeding edge will only screw you over... just ask KJV... He was on OpenSuSE and had nothing but weird problems.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Henry Huang UniC Solution - Communication Unified VoIP & Open Source software Consultant
Hey Henry, I'm not sure what version of Ubuntu he tested against. The other thing to note is that he tested the different distros in VMware virtual machines first. And only the ones that passed his test there, went on to testing on real hardware (Debian and Ubuntu). So there may have been an an interaction with VMWare that wasn't accounted for. Again his focus was fixing the sqlite bug, and reliable traffic shaping. So here are the results of my initial testing of Ubuntu in MY environment. I installed Ubuntu server 9.10 i386 on real hardware. First off, there was an install bug where grub wouldn't install itself into the MBR on my disks that were already partitioned. (Raid 1 /boot partition). I had to blow away all partitions and re-create. Then it installed okay. It did, however, have a nice feature where you could specify a hot-spare for RAID 1 during setup. Secondly, balance-alb mode appears broken for bonded interfaces with my switch (HP Procurve). Ubuntu just sat there drooling and not transmitting packets. As soon as I changed over to balance-tlb, things worked. Thirdly, the clustering tools (openais/pacemaker) are in their infancy. Openais doesn't even come with an init script to get it started. And as a general distro thing, Ubuntu doesn't have any tool as elegant as chkconfig for managing the init scripts. The administrative features of the OS don't feel nearly as refined as CentOS or SuSE. Since I'm trying to create a highly-available clustered freeswitch environment I need a cluster-ready distro to handle that. Not having OpenAIS/pacemaker work out-of-the-box is a show-stopper for me. So it looks like my choices are CentOS or SuSE. Right now, I'm leaning towards using Suse 11.1 and just using ODBC for the freeswitch core database to get around the SQLite bug. That way, at least I can use a current kernel and current software. True, I can't use the freeswitch perl module. But RedHat has had a long-standing perl bug as well. (Google redhat perl bug). Also, Karl reported GCC segfaulting during big compiles on SuSE 11.2 but I haven't run into any. True, I haven't compiled any kernels, but freeswitch compiles just fine. Hope this helps, Bill Henry Huang wrote:
Which version of Ubuntu was tested against? It's surprising to find such testing result about CentOS.
participants (8)
-
Anthony Minessale
-
Bill W
-
Bill W.
-
Brian West
-
Henry Huang
-
Jason White
-
Joseph L. Casale
-
Saeed Ahmed