of course you have to use a proxy if are behind a fw ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:27 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] On FS-HA feature: HA + Balancing ?

For now I use NAPTR SRV for load balancing (it's round robin but it avoids any proxy) for HA you have LVS, Pacemaker, Linix-HA, IBM cluster etc...

----- Original Message ----- From: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists@infosecurity.ch> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:55 AM Subject: [Freeswitch-users] On FS-HA feature: HA + Balancing ?

...

Hi guys,

first of all my compliments for FS-HA features, something really enterprise that make the life of infrastructure architect and system administration much simpler.

My simpler question is:

Does FS with HA features can do "High availability AND Load Balancing" without using third party SIP Proxy?

If so the FS would simplify a lot most of the IP architecture as it may be possible to just put more FS boxes into a HA+Balancing "server farm" when you need more power.

Is that possible?

Fabio

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org