The later option would be preferable... But I would probably do something like rsync them onto the box and use a ram drive From: Pete Kay <petedao@gmail.com> Reply-To: <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:09:43 +0800 To: <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] seek suggestion on TTS option Hi, I have a question about TTS efficiency. I have some text that I need to read out when someone calls in and these texts do change. Here are two options I am thinking about: In my configuration, I would have DB and FS on different servers. DB server is SCSI. Option 1:Store the text in DB Within JS: 1.Get the text from DB 2. use system (command) to create a wav file on locate file system 3. Use playback to play the wav file Option 2: Pre-created the file using NFS ( at the same machine as DB) Within JS: 1. Get the filename from DB 2. Get the wav file from NFS 3. Use playback to play the wav file In a highly-loaded environment, which option would be preferable considering speed and efficiency? Is there other better option? Any input will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Pete _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org