No, you can't nest them like that. But you can stack multiple patterns inside a pattern and use break_on_match="true" to prevent further matching attempts inside that macro. Look at "voicemail_message_count" macro in the vanilla configs for a good example of that. -MC On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jakob <freeswitch@orresta.no-ip.com> wrote:

Hi,

Can you make a construct like below? Match the second argument within a match statement. Or are there a switch statement that can be used?

<macro name="voicemail_message_count"> <input pattern="^(1):(.*)$"> <match> <input pattern="(.*):(new)$"> <match> </match> </input> <input pattern="(.*):(saved)$"> <match> </match> </input> <input pattern="(.*):(urgent)$"> <match> </match> </input> </match> <nomatch> </nomatch> </input> </macro>

Best Regards Jakob

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- Michael S Collins Twitter: @mercutioviz http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org