Freeswitch on embedded device: interesting or not?
Hello guys, lately I've been trying to compile Freeswitch for a MIPS architecture. With the help of the community I've understood that my target architecture was wrong because of limitations in the SDK toolchain's. I'm not writing now to get help but to start (I hope) a discussion. I would like to understand your points of view about the general idea of porting FS on embedded devices. I'm not hardware expert at all; someone says that porting FS to any appliance which is not x86 based is a loss of time, because ARM and MIPS processors just lack computational power, this could be true, but maybe it depends on what you expect FS to do on such an embedded architecture. We are now all used to the amazing performance of FS on multicores 64bit cpus but still the one line description of FS is: "FreeSWITCH is an open source telephony platform designed to facilitate the creation of voice and chat driven products scaling from a soft-phone up to a soft-switch". Therefore a scaled down FS could be done, do you think is interesting? I'm not speaking here from a technical point of view, I know others have already compiled FS for ARM and MIPS and their experience is on the wiki. Would you consider a scaled down FS only for x86 architectures (e.g. the pfSense package or Atom)? Regards, Claudio Internet Email Confidentiality Footer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- La presente comunicazione, con le informazioni in essa contenute e ogni documento o file allegato, e' rivolta unicamente alla/e persona/e cui e' indirizzata ed alle altre da questa autorizzata/e a riceverla. Se non siete i destinatari/autorizzati siete avvisati che qualsiasi azione, copia, comunicazione, divulgazione o simili basate sul contenuto di tali informazioni e' vietata e potrebbe essere contro la legge (art. 616 C.P., D.Lgs n. 196/2003 Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali). Se avete ricevuto questa comunicazione per errore, vi preghiamo di darne immediata notizia al mittente e di distruggere il messaggio originale e ogni file allegato senza farne copia alcuna o riprodurne in alcun modo il contenuto. This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and are confidential and/or may contain legally privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake or are not one of the addressees above, you may take no action based on it, and you may not copy or show it to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and point out the error which has occurred. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know of at least one person who has had good luck with small applications on arm, in fact there are good working instructions for how to cross for arm on the wiki that are known to work. Mike On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Cavalera Claudio Luigi wrote:
Hello guys, lately I've been trying to compile Freeswitch for a MIPS architecture. With the help of the community I've understood that my target architecture was wrong because of limitations in the SDK toolchain's. I'm not writing now to get help but to start (I hope) a discussion. I would like to understand your points of view about the general idea of porting FS on embedded devices. I'm not hardware expert at all; someone says that porting FS to any appliance which is not x86 based is a loss of time, because ARM and MIPS processors just lack computational power, this could be true, but maybe it depends on what you expect FS to do on such an embedded architecture. We are now all used to the amazing performance of FS on multicores 64bit cpus but still the one line description of FS is: "FreeSWITCH is an open source telephony platform designed to facilitate the creation of voice and chat driven products scaling from a soft- phone up to a soft-switch". Therefore a scaled down FS could be done, do you think is interesting? I'm not speaking here from a technical point of view, I know others have already compiled FS for ARM and MIPS and their experience is on the wiki. Would you consider a scaled down FS only for x86 architectures (e.g. the pfSense package or Atom)?
Regards, Claudio
participants (2)
-
Cavalera Claudio Luigi
-
Michael Jerris