Separate NICs for Performance
Hey Folks: For a FS box that's generally handling higher amounts of inbound/outbound call traffic (say 500 - 700 calls) and registrations (30 - 50 per second), is it recommended to split off the signaling and media traffic onto separate NICs for performance reasons? Or is it better to split all the traffic for the phones and outside traffic to carriers into separate profiles and split those profiles onto separate NICs? or perhaps none of the above and there's still a better solution I didn't mention ;) ? Thanks, Gabe
If the nic's have their own bus you could do that to improve network performance of sip signaling and media... now the neat thing would be to have an option to have say three network interfaces and have FreeSWITCH round robin them per call. I smell a bounty. /b On Feb 6, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Gabriel Kuri wrote:
Hey Folks:
For a FS box that's generally handling higher amounts of inbound/outbound call traffic (say 500 - 700 calls) and registrations (30 - 50 per second), is it recommended to split off the signaling and media traffic onto separate NICs for performance reasons? Or is it better to split all the traffic for the phones and outside traffic to carriers into separate profiles and split those profiles onto separate NICs? or perhaps none of the above and there's still a better solution I didn't mention ;) ?
Thanks,
Gabe
Bonding? Intel ANS? On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
If the nic's have their own bus you could do that to improve network performance of sip signaling and media... now the neat thing would be to have an option to have say three network interfaces and have FreeSWITCH round robin them per call. I smell a bounty.
/b
-- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.astlinux.org http://www.star2star.com
That would work too I suspect. /b On Feb 6, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
Bonding? Intel ANS?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
If the nic's have their own bus you could do that to improve network performance of sip signaling and media... now the neat thing would be to have an option to have say three network interfaces and have FreeSWITCH round robin them per call. I smell a bounty.
/b
I think the big problem is still going to be interrupts and other networking stuff. On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
That would work too I suspect. /b
-- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.astlinux.org http://www.star2star.com
Wouldn't be a huge deal if each card has a dedicated bus then it wouldn't be fighting for bandwidth... its still going to be hitting a limit at some point but you might get more milage out of it. /b On Feb 6, 2009, at 6:06 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
I think the big problem is still going to be interrupts and other networking stuff.
participants (3)
-
Brian West
-
Gabriel Kuri
-
Kristian Kielhofner