Hi , I have this problem that has been taking quite some time , I have 600 concurrent calls running on freeswitch in WINDOWS , and running on another pc (UBUNTU ) , i find that freeswitch on ubuntu is much more efficient than windows . The basic error that i am getting on Windows when running it for 10 hours is : [CRIT] mod_event_socket.c 2618 Socket Error! At Originate Result : *NORMAL_CLEARING, which is due to Socket Error .* *Is there some way i can have the same efficiency ? *
Probably not without doing some work in the code. We have done quite a bit to optimize for linux, someone would have to do some deep analysis of any bottlenecks in windows and address them. On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Ryan Gholam <ryangholam@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ,
I have this problem that has been taking quite some time , I have 600 concurrent calls running on freeswitch in WINDOWS , and running on another pc (UBUNTU ) , i find that freeswitch on ubuntu is much more efficient than windows .
The basic error that i am getting on Windows when running it for 10 hours is : [CRIT] mod_event_socket.c 2618 Socket Error!
At Originate Result : NORMAL_CLEARING, which is due to Socket Error .
Is there some way i can have the same efficiency ?
Thank you for your reply , probably the main issue is that i run 300 playback with 300 record in the same time on linux it works while in windows it doesn't with the same code here and there , so freeswitch loaded in windows throws this error . Normal_Clearing and socket_error . On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
Probably not without doing some work in the code. We have done quite a bit to optimize for linux, someone would have to do some deep analysis of any bottlenecks in windows and address them.
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Ryan Gholam <ryangholam@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ,
I have this problem that has been taking quite some time , I have 600 concurrent calls running on freeswitch in WINDOWS , and running on another pc (UBUNTU ) , i find that freeswitch on ubuntu is much more efficient than windows .
The basic error that i am getting on Windows when running it for 10 hours is : [CRIT] mod_event_socket.c 2618 Socket Error!
At Originate Result : NORMAL_CLEARING, which is due to Socket Error .
Is there some way i can have the same efficiency ?
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Just curious... Is it possible to just switch over to using Linux for both of your FS installs? I doubt FS will ever run as well on Windows as it does under Linux. I believe it's mostly developed on Linux and the vast majority of it's users use it under Linux and so that's were it gets the most testing. Generally, when running something (especially open source software) I like to find out what the developers are developing the software and testing the software on. From what I've read it's mainly CentOS or Debian. So, those might be the best choice to get the best performance and least problems with FS. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Ryan Gholam" <ryangholam@gmail.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: 3/26/2014 8:17:12 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UBUNTU VS WINDOWS
Thank you for your reply , probably the main issue is that i run 300 playback with 300 record in the same time on linux it works while in windows it doesn’t with the same code here and there , so freeswitch loaded in windows throws this error . Normal_Clearing and socket_error .
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
Probably not without doing some work in the code. We have done quite a bit to optimize for linux, someone would have to do some deep analysis of any bottlenecks in windows and address them.
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Ryan Gholam <ryangholam@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ,
I have this problem that has been taking quite some time , I have 600 concurrent calls running on freeswitch in WINDOWS , and running on another pc (UBUNTU ) , i find that freeswitch on ubuntu is much more efficient than windows .
The basic error that i am getting on Windows when running it for 10 hours is : [CRIT] mod_event_socket.c 2618 Socket Error!
At Originate Result : NORMAL_CLEARING, which is due to Socket Error .
Is there some way i can have the same efficiency ?
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
There is a lot more info needed here... There are no problems with running FS on windows. I have had many workloads running on windows for years now, in production and in excess of 3000 channels. However I admit this is on the 1.2 stable branch. Just as if we were trying to debug a problem on a linux box, the same thing applies to windows. Need details about the process running. For example what user was the process running as? Interactive or as a service? Is UAC enabled on he system? What roles and features are installed? How much Ram is on the system? Etc...? Just like under linux, the same applies for windows. Do you have a process dump at the time of the exception? That should tell a whole lot more :) Other things that come to mind. Have you tried it on another windows box? A reference box with nothing else installed? How about on newer versions of windows server? Does the same problem exist on 2012 or 2012R2? Since you are running on a 64 bit OS, are you running the FS x64 build? This like any other issuse can be solved with a little info and debugging. If you need some help with this, feel free to contact me off list. --Dave _____ From: bruce@sqls.net To: FreeSWITCH Users Help [mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org] Sent: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:09:02 -0700 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UBUNTU VS WINDOWS Just curious... Is it possible to just switch over to using Linux for both of your FS installs? I doubt FS will ever run as well on Windows as it does under Linux. I believe it's mostly developed on Linux and the vast majority of it's users use it under Linux and so that's were it gets the most testing. Generally, when running something (especially open source software) I like to find out what the developers are developing the software and testing the software on. From what I've read it's mainly CentOS or Debian. So, those might be the best choice to get the best performance and least problems with FS. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Ryan Gholam" <ryangholam@gmail.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: 3/26/2014 8:17:12 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UBUNTU VS WINDOWS Thank you for your reply , probably the main issue is that i run 300 playback with 300 record in the same time on linux it works while in windows it doesn’t with the same code here and there , so freeswitch loaded in windows throws this error . Normal_Clearing and socket_error . On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote: Probably not without doing some work in the code. We have done quite a bit to optimize for linux, someone would have to do some deep analysis of any bottlenecks in windows and address them. On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Ryan Gholam <ryangholam@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ,
I have this problem that has been taking quite some time , I have 600 concurrent calls running on freeswitch in WINDOWS , and running on another pc (UBUNTU ) , i find that freeswitch on ubuntu is much more efficient than windows .
The basic error that i am getting on Windows when running it for 10 hours is : [CRIT] mod_event_socket.c 2618 Socket Error!
At Originate Result : NORMAL_CLEARING, which is due to Socket Error .
Is there some way i can have the same efficiency ?
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Hi Dave , Thank you for helping me out , okay then i'll try on the stable version but could you provide me with the .exe link for freeswitch 1.2.stable , thus i;ve been trying all day to build up the project but a lot of errors occurring FreeSwitchCore.lib and i did exactly as documented . thank you On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Dave R. Kompel <drk@drkngs.net> wrote:
There is a lot more info needed here... There are no problems with running FS on windows. I have had many workloads running on windows for years now, in production and in excess of 3000 channels. However I admit this is on the 1.2 stable branch.
Just as if we were trying to debug a problem on a linux box, the same thing applies to windows. Need details about the process running. For example what user was the process running as? Interactive or as a service? Is UAC enabled on he system? What roles and features are installed? How much Ram is on the system? Etc...?
Just like under linux, the same applies for windows. Do you have a process dump at the time of the exception? That should tell a whole lot more :)
Other things that come to mind. Have you tried it on another windows box? A reference box with nothing else installed? How about on newer versions of windows server? Does the same problem exist on 2012 or 2012R2?
Since you are running on a 64 bit OS, are you running the FS x64 build?
This like any other issuse can be solved with a little info and debugging.
If you need some help with this, feel free to contact me off list.
--Dave
------------------------------ *From:* bruce@sqls.net *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help [mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org] *Sent:* Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:09:02 -0700
*Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] UBUNTU VS WINDOWS
Just curious... Is it possible to just switch over to using Linux for both of your FS installs? I doubt FS will ever run as well on Windows as it does under Linux. I believe it's mostly developed on Linux and the vast majority of it's users use it under Linux and so that's were it gets the most testing.
Generally, when running something (especially open source software) I like to find out what the developers are developing the software and testing the software on. From what I've read it's mainly CentOS or Debian. So, those might be the best choice to get the best performance and least problems with FS.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Ryan Gholam" <ryangholam@gmail.com> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: 3/26/2014 8:17:12 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UBUNTU VS WINDOWS
Thank you for your reply , probably the main issue is that i run 300 playback with 300 record in the same time on linux it works while in windows it doesn't with the same code here and there , so freeswitch loaded in windows throws this error . Normal_Clearing and socket_error .
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
Probably not without doing some work in the code. We have done quite a bit to optimize for linux, someone would have to do some deep analysis of any bottlenecks in windows and address them.
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Ryan Gholam <ryangholam@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ,
I have this problem that has been taking quite some time , I have 600 concurrent calls running on freeswitch in WINDOWS , and running on another pc (UBUNTU ) , i find that freeswitch on ubuntu is much more efficient than windows .
The basic error that i am getting on Windows when running it for 10 hours is : [CRIT] mod_event_socket.c 2618 Socket Error!
At Originate Result : NORMAL_CLEARING, which is due to Socket Error .
Is there some way i can have the same efficiency ?
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (4)
-
bruce＠sqls.net
-
Dave R. Kompel
-
Michael Jerris
-
Ryan Gholam