performance comparison between centos and freebsd
Hi, I have tested with running freeswitch1.0.5 on freebsd and centos 5.4. The expectation is that freeswitch 1.0.5 acting as media proxy would perform better in freebsd, but I found that freebsd can only sustain half of the total concurrent calls as in centos 5.4 (120 vs 60). The test is run on both ATOM CPU and VIA c7 and the result is relatively the same. Does anyone know why? Is this some sort of setting issues in freebsd kernel? I have tried with pure freebsd and pfsense and the result is the same. Woody
Either this will help: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Download_%26_Installation_Guide#Threading_Li... or nothing will. FreeBSD is always a pain to support because it's like a spoiled actor in a bad movie. It makes many demands on everyone, it should be called DivaOS. Still we try to support it and if it does not work as well we really can't do much about it. On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Woody Dickson <woodydickson@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi,
I have tested with running freeswitch1.0.5 on freebsd and centos 5.4.
The expectation is that freeswitch 1.0.5 acting as media proxy would perform better in freebsd, but I found that freebsd can only sustain half of the total concurrent calls as in centos 5.4 (120 vs 60).
The test is run on both ATOM CPU and VIA c7 and the result is relatively the same.
Does anyone know why? Is this some sort of setting issues in freebsd kernel? I have tried with pure freebsd and pfsense and the result is the same.
Woody
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:58:07AM -0500, Anthony Minessale wrote:
Either this will help:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Download_%26_Installation_Guide#Threading_Li...
or nothing will.
FreeBSD is always a pain to support because it's like a spoiled actor in a bad movie. It makes many demands on everyone, it should be called DivaOS. Still we try to support it and if it does not work as well we really can't do much about it.
Also, you completely neglected to mention what version of FreeBSD you're using (you should probably be using 8.x). Andrew
I appreciate the "pains" taken. We are a FreeBSD shop here, and it was no trouble at all to get FS up and running. We are running FreeBSD 8.0 on 64bit Intel and so far haven't had any problems at all. -Tim Anthony Minessale wrote:
Either this will help:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Download_%26_Installation_Guide#Threading_Li...
or nothing will.
FreeBSD is always a pain to support because it's like a spoiled actor in a bad movie. It makes many demands on everyone, it should be called DivaOS. Still we try to support it and if it does not work as well we really can't do much about it.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Woody Dickson <woodydickson@gmail.com <mailto:woodydickson@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I have tested with running freeswitch1.0.5 on freebsd and centos 5.4.
The expectation is that freeswitch 1.0.5 acting as media proxy would perform better in freebsd, but I found that freebsd can only sustain half of the total concurrent calls as in centos 5.4 (120 vs 60).
The test is run on both ATOM CPU and VIA c7 and the result is relatively the same.
Does anyone know why? Is this some sort of setting issues in freebsd kernel? I have tried with pure freebsd and pfsense and the result is the same.
Woody
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <mailto:MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com <mailto:PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <mailto:sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org <mailto:googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (4)
-
Andrew Thompson
-
Anthony Minessale
-
Tim St. Pierre
-
Woody Dickson