Bug ID: FS-2868 Status?
Hello FreeSwitchers! Am attempting to compile the latest (off of Git) code for FS on Solaris 11 Express on an 64-Bit x86 machine. However, I'm running into the error that Bruce McAllister has reported on 23rd Nov 2010. The bug is still sitting unresolved. So I'm assuming there's a backdoor trick to fixing this OR that some other version of FS code doesn't have this issue. Could someone please let me on the secret on which build compiles on x86 Solaris v10+ and/or what the backdoor trick to bypass this is? Should I not compile the hash module where this bug seems to be originating from? Your help is appreciated in advance, Cheers, \AEG
The problem is a bug in solaris perl development package that I haven't been doing anything about since I do not use perl for roughly a decade. Its not the hash module, its the perl module. Am 23.03.2011 um 11:44 schrieb A E [Gmail]:
Hello FreeSwitchers!
Am attempting to compile the latest (off of Git) code for FS on Solaris 11 Express on an 64-Bit x86 machine. However, I'm running into the error that Bruce McAllister has reported on 23rd Nov 2010. The bug is still sitting unresolved. So I'm assuming there's a backdoor trick to fixing this OR that some other version of FS code doesn't have this issue. Could someone please let me on the secret on which build compiles on x86 Solaris v10+ and/or what the backdoor trick to bypass this is? Should I not compile the hash module where this bug seems to be originating from?
Your help is appreciated in advance, Cheers, \AEG _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Michal Bielicki Geschäftsführer / CEO Seventh Signal Ltd. & Co. KG Weigandufer 45, Büro 115, D-12059 Berlin Voice: +49 30 60988730 Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRA 44413 B Ust.-ID: DE266981999 Geschäftsführer: Michal Bielicki Persönlich Haftende Gesellschafterin: Seventh Signal Ltd, 69 Great Hampton St. Birmingham, B18 6EW, GB, Company Nr.: 06889439 WWW.: http://www.seventhsignal.de
You can see the results of my builds here: http://www.freeswitch.de:8080/ for both openindiana and solaris express 1 Am 23.03.2011 um 11:44 schrieb A E [Gmail]:
Hello FreeSwitchers!
Am attempting to compile the latest (off of Git) code for FS on Solaris 11 Express on an 64-Bit x86 machine. However, I'm running into the error that Bruce McAllister has reported on 23rd Nov 2010. The bug is still sitting unresolved. So I'm assuming there's a backdoor trick to fixing this OR that some other version of FS code doesn't have this issue. Could someone please let me on the secret on which build compiles on x86 Solaris v10+ and/or what the backdoor trick to bypass this is? Should I not compile the hash module where this bug seems to be originating from?
Your help is appreciated in advance, Cheers, \AEG _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Michal Bielicki Geschäftsführer / CEO Seventh Signal Ltd. & Co. KG Weigandufer 45, Büro 115, D-12059 Berlin Voice: +49 30 60988730 Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRA 44413 B Ust.-ID: DE266981999 Geschäftsführer: Michal Bielicki Persönlich Haftende Gesellschafterin: Seventh Signal Ltd, 69 Great Hampton St. Birmingham, B18 6EW, GB, Company Nr.: 06889439 WWW.: http://www.seventhsignal.de
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Michal Bielicki < michal.bielicki@seventhsignal.de> wrote:
You can see the results of my builds here: http://www.freeswitch.de:8080/ for both openindiana and solaris express 1
Thanks Michael. I noticed that you aren't making mod_hash which might be how you're getting through the entire build? I know you said it's not mod-hash but the PERL module but I guess it's getting encountered/used in the compilation of mod_hash?
BTW, I am also getting these WARNINGs for all sorts of "op", <<, = etc. *warning: integer overflow detected: op "<<" (E_INTEGER_OVERFLOW_DETECTED)* But I noticed that you don't have them. Did you ever get them? and if you did then how did you solve them? Thanks \AEG
participants (2)
-
A E [Gmail]
-
Michal Bielicki