Re: [Freeswitch-users] nonat?
On Friday 20 August 2021 at 20:48:34, Bote Man wrote:
My sip_profiles/internal.xml and external.xml have these lines: <param name="rtp-ip" value="$${local_ip_v4}"/> <param name="sip-ip" value="$${local_ip_v4}"/> <param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="auto-nat"/> <param name="ext-sip-ip" value="auto-nat"/>
which magically "just works" between internal extensions as well as with a couple cloud SIP providers. This is with FreeSWITCH version 1.10.5 from about a year ago.
Yep, absolutely identical to what I have here with 1.10.6. My main question is "why does the option '-nonat' not work as documented?" Antony. -- I want to build a machine that will be proud of me. - Danny Hillis, creator of The Connection Machine Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me.
On Monday 23 August 2021 at 12:33:16, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 20 August 2021 at 20:48:34, Bote Man wrote:
My sip_profiles/internal.xml and external.xml have these lines: <param name="rtp-ip" value="$${local_ip_v4}"/> <param name="sip-ip" value="$${local_ip_v4}"/> <param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="auto-nat"/> <param name="ext-sip-ip" value="auto-nat"/>
which magically "just works" between internal extensions as well as with a couple cloud SIP providers. This is with FreeSWITCH version 1.10.5 from about a year ago.
Yep, absolutely identical to what I have here with 1.10.6.
My main question is "why does the option '-nonat' not work as documented?"
The other thing which I have found, which makes me think I'm missing something really simple, is that if the machine running FreeSwitch does not have a route to the Internet, I can't even register telephones on its local network. 192.168.32.59 - Freeswitch server 192.168.32.77 - Yealink T41 192.168.32.78 - Yealink VP530 Phones simply get no response whatever to the Register requests (measured with sngrep running on the FreeSwitch server). If I put a route to the Internet back in again, and then restart FreeSwitch, the phones can then register (and start using my public IP address to try to talk to each other). PS: Apologies for the duplication of posts from Friday - I assumed they had disappeared in a spam filter or similar, given that they hadn't turned up on the list archives after 48 hours (so I knew they hadn't reached the list, not just that my copies hadn't come back to me). Antony. -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6890 - providing 16 million IPv4 addresses for talking to yourself. Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me.
participants (1)
-
Antony Stone