On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

skype clients should run with FS on the same box.

You could run both FS and skype clients on another box just as a gateway if you want scale. We had run multi- FS instances on one box for scale/stable purpose, but you can get the idea from http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_Testimonial_on_Idapted.com

-- About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn

Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com>

Thanks Seven. I had a good read of that testimonial and it's basically saying what you just said here in a line. The question now is are the design docs for that setup proprietary or kinda sorta can be GPL'ed or "shared" in some form? :)

If not, then just to clarify, the FS-Skype servers load their own mod_skypopen and is just a gateway to send calls to once it's determined by the FS in the center acting like a soft-switch/call-control platform? Is it completely possible to run/build an FS instance with just mod_skyopen or mod_dingaling (and anything else that's fundamentally needed by FS) loaded? I mean I could Google this but it might help if you could tell me what your modules.conf.xml looks like for Skype only instance? Thanks so much in advance, and apologies if I'm being unreasonable in requesting for the info :)

Ok cool. Thank you so much. I found this as some very slimmed down modules.conf.xml figuring FS running on an embedded platform might give me the best case from which to build on. It's here: https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/freeswitch/files/etc.minimal/au... Apart from adding mod_skypopen to this, does this look good? What else needs to be added to it? Thanks so much for your help :) On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, exactly, you could remove any unnecessary modules if you don't use them.

to be clear, you could send calls from FS1 to FS2 and FS3 give you have proper dialplan set to route calls to the desired destination. that means you could just treat FS2 and FS3 as a third party sip gateway but they can routing calls to anywhere you want.

FS1 (mod_sofia) ---------------------- (mod_sofia)FS2(mod_skypopen) -------------------skype \ \------------------ (mod_sofia)FS3(mod_dingaling) ---------------------gtalk

That testimonial is completely following the wiki's sharing rule, but you can use the idea completely freely.

On Monday, January 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, A E [Gmail] wrote:

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

skype clients should run with FS on the same box.

You could run both FS and skype clients on another box just as a gateway if you want scale. We had run multi- FS instances on one box for scale/stable purpose, but you can get the idea from http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_Testimonial_on_Idapted.com

-- About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn

Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com>

Thanks Seven. I had a good read of that testimonial and it's basically saying what you just said here in a line. The question now is are the design docs for that setup proprietary or kinda sorta can be GPL'ed or "shared" in some form? :)

If not, then just to clarify, the FS-Skype servers load their own mod_skypopen and is just a gateway to send calls to once it's determined by the FS in the center acting like a soft-switch/call-control platform? Is it completely possible to run/build an FS instance with just mod_skyopen or mod_dingaling (and anything else that's fundamentally needed by FS) loaded? I mean I could Google this but it might help if you could tell me what your modules.conf.xml looks like for Skype only instance?

Thanks so much in advance, and apologies if I'm being unreasonable in requesting for the info :)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 2:20 AM, A E [Gmail] wrote:

Ok cool. Thank you so much.

I found this as some very slimmed down modules.conf.xml figuring FS running on an embedded platform might give me the best case from which to build on. It's here: https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/freeswitch/files/etc.minimal/au...

Apart from adding mod_skypopen to this, does this look good? What else needs to be added to it?

Add anything you need, see http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSwitch_Modules for detail

you still can remove some modules if you don't use them, e.g. mod_cdr_csv etc.

Haha mmm yes, I do understand that but maybe I didn't phrase my question correctly...I'm talking strictly in reference to the FS-Skype box in your environment and what is the bare minimum I can have on that box to be able to successfully run it as a Skype gateway. Kinda trying to get hands on your modules.conf.xml but if that's an inappropriate request, then I apologize in advance.

Thanks so much for your help :)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, exactly, you could remove any unnecessary modules if you don't use them.

to be clear, you could send calls from FS1 to FS2 and FS3 give you have proper dialplan set to route calls to the desired destination. that means you could just treat FS2 and FS3 as a third party sip gateway but they can routing calls to anywhere you want.

FS1 (mod_sofia) ---------------------- (mod_sofia)FS2(mod_skypopen) -------------------skype \ \------------------ (mod_sofia)FS3(mod_dingaling) ---------------------gtalk

That testimonial is completely following the wiki's sharing rule, but you can use the idea completely freely.

On Monday, January 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, A E [Gmail] wrote:

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

skype clients should run with FS on the same box.

You could run both FS and skype clients on another box just as a gateway if you want scale. We had run multi- FS instances on one box for scale/stable purpose, but you can get the idea from http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_Testimonial_on_Idapted.com

-- About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn

Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com>

Thanks Seven. I had a good read of that testimonial and it's basically saying what you just said here in a line. The question now is are the design docs for that setup proprietary or kinda sorta can be GPL'ed or "shared" in some form? :)

If not, then just to clarify, the FS-Skype servers load their own mod_skypopen and is just a gateway to send calls to once it's determined by the FS in the center acting like a soft-switch/call-control platform? Is it completely possible to run/build an FS instance with just mod_skyopen or mod_dingaling (and anything else that's fundamentally needed by FS) loaded? I mean I could Google this but it might help if you could tell me what your modules.conf.xml looks like for Skype only instance?

Thanks so much in advance, and apologies if I'm being unreasonable in requesting for the info :)

Thanks Seven, Yes, I have been using that page all along. My problem is that I have Debian running on Sparc. The Skype client downloaded by the Installer in Skyopen is build for x86. I don't know if the Skype client has also been modified by Giovanni or he doesn't have access to its source code. Anyway, I'll try to work it out. Thanks again for your help. On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry, Idapted was history and I left and I cannot access that server now.

There's no secret in modules.conf but you should follow this page to make skypopen work on your box http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Skypiax

On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 9:10 AM, A E [Gmail] wrote:

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 2:20 AM, A E [Gmail] wrote:

Ok cool. Thank you so much.

I found this as some very slimmed down modules.conf.xml figuring FS running on an embedded platform might give me the best case from which to build on. It's here: https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/freeswitch/files/etc.minimal/au...

Apart from adding mod_skypopen to this, does this look good? What else needs to be added to it?

Add anything you need, see http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSwitch_Modules for detail

you still can remove some modules if you don't use them, e.g. mod_cdr_csv etc.

Haha mmm yes, I do understand that but maybe I didn't phrase my question correctly...I'm talking strictly in reference to the FS-Skype box in your environment and what is the bare minimum I can have on that box to be able to successfully run it as a Skype gateway. Kinda trying to get hands on your modules.conf.xml but if that's an inappropriate request, then I apologize in advance.

Thanks so much for your help :)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, exactly, you could remove any unnecessary modules if you don't use them.

to be clear, you could send calls from FS1 to FS2 and FS3 give you have proper dialplan set to route calls to the desired destination. that means you could just treat FS2 and FS3 as a third party sip gateway but they can routing calls to anywhere you want.

FS1 (mod_sofia) ---------------------- (mod_sofia)FS2(mod_skypopen) -------------------skype \ \------------------ (mod_sofia)FS3(mod_dingaling) ---------------------gtalk

That testimonial is completely following the wiki's sharing rule, but you can use the idea completely freely.

On Monday, January 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, A E [Gmail] wrote:

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:

skype clients should run with FS on the same box.

You could run both FS and skype clients on another box just as a gateway if you want scale. We had run multi- FS instances on one box for scale/stable purpose, but you can get the idea from http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_Testimonial_on_Idapted.com

-- About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn

Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com>

Thanks Seven. I had a good read of that testimonial and it's basically saying what you just said here in a line. The question now is are the design docs for that setup proprietary or kinda sorta can be GPL'ed or "shared" in some form? :)

If not, then just to clarify, the FS-Skype servers load their own mod_skypopen and is just a gateway to send calls to once it's determined by the FS in the center acting like a soft-switch/call-control platform? Is it completely possible to run/build an FS instance with just mod_skyopen or mod_dingaling (and anything else that's fundamentally needed by FS) loaded? I mean I could Google this but it might help if you could tell me what your modules.conf.xml looks like for Skype only instance?

Thanks so much in advance, and apologies if I'm being unreasonable in requesting for the info :)

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org