This patch appears to not work. I removed it and re-opened the jira it was submitted from. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Patrick Lists <freeswitch-list@puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:

Hi all,

In the output of freeswitch -h I noticed there is a (for me) new argument -bf that FreeSWITCH can be started with. Is -bf supposed to work in combination with -nc where it will block until it has fully started and then goes into the background?

When I start FreeSWITCH (git from yesterday) as follows: /opt/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch -u freeswitch -g freeswitch -core -bf -nc then FreeSWITCH does start, goes into the background but I can not connect to it with fs_cli on the same host. When I omit -bf from the line above then all is well and I can connect with fs_cli.

I'm interested in the blocking part because when you do # service freeswitch start right now it will immediately return [ OK ] but I prefer to get an ok after FreeSWITCH actually has fully started.

Did I misunderstood the -bf arg?

Thanks! Patrick

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900