stun not working in fs 1.0.4?
Hello. I'm trying to configure stun in fs 1.0.4 vars.xml <X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="bind_server_ip=auto"/> <X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="external_sip_ip=stun:example.com"/> <X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="external_rtp_ip=stun:example.com"/> external.xml <param name="rtp-ip" value="$${local_ip_v4}"/> <param name="sip-ip" value="$${local_ip_v4}"/> <param name="ext-sip-ip" value="$${external_sip_ip}"/> <param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="$${external_rtp_ip}"/> In this configuration, the address in ext_rtp_ip transmitted literally (it is: "stun:stun.exmaple.com") If you do not specify ext_rtp_ip stun then allegedly began to work. But as in bug SFSIP-163 (http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/SFSIP-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ) Via: IP is replaced, and SDP - no. How do I fix this? Upgrade fs to trunk?
Brian West пишет:
Yes!
Ok. Brian, why fs no two branches of the stable and trunk?
/b
On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:43 AM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
How do I fix this? Upgrade fs to trunk?
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Because TRUNK is stable... its only fixes going in usually and if things do break they don't stay broken for long. Ask anyone our trunk is more table then most commercial products. /b On Oct 5, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
Ok. Brian, why fs no two branches of the stable and trunk?
Brian West пишет:
Because TRUNK is stable... its only fixes going in usually and if things do break they don't stay broken for long.
Ask anyone our trunk is more table then most commercial products.
This separation of the branches a very bad influence on the packaging. That is gathered deb-package trunk 15094. Man found in the trunk bug. Must again rebuild the package from the new trunk...
/b
On Oct 5, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
Ok. Brian, why fs no two branches of the stable and trunk?
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I am not sure what you mean, do you think that fixes from today should somehow go somewhere else before we do a release? On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:21 AM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
Brian West пишет:
Because TRUNK is stable... its only fixes going in usually and if things do break they don't stay broken for long.
Ask anyone our trunk is more table then most commercial products.
This separation of the branches a very bad influence on the packaging. That is gathered deb-package trunk 15094. Man found in the trunk bug. Must again rebuild the package from the new trunk...
/b
On Oct 5, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
Ok. Brian, why fs no two branches of the stable and trunk?
participants (4)
-
Brian West
-
Michael Jerris
-
Rupa Schomaker
-
Vladimir Elizarov