What are the calls doing? Bridged? to an IVR? If so, which one.
If you do a smaller number of calls does the same thing happen.  If you can do it with 1 or 2 calls you could use valgrind.

valgrind --tool=memcheck --log-file-exactly=vg.log --leak-check=full --leak-resolution=high --show-reachable=yes /usr/local/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch





On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Jeff Pyle <jpyle@fidelityvoice.com> wrote:
I just updated from repo.profhost.eu.  The most recent timestamp on the packages was 2013-01-28 03:41:21 GMT.  Same behavior.  At 5 minutes it was using 12.5% RAM.  At 40 minutes, 60.4%.  After disconnecting the calls the usage returned to 8.5%.

I started toggling config items to see if I could impact this.  I found one that seems to have an effect:  rtp-timer-name in the sofia profile config.  By changing it from 'soft' to 'none', the CPU utilization with 30 calls dropped from ~70% to ~46%, and the RAM usage is rock solid at 5.8%.

That's great, but does it make any sense?

Does an rtp-timer-name of 'none' pose any risks?



- Jeff
  


On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Jeff Pyle <jpyle@fidelityvoice.com> wrote:
It's on Voyage Linux, a cousin of Debian.  I believe it uses glibc.


- Jeff


On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <kris@kriskinc.com> wrote:
Out of curiosity does your distro use uclibc, eglibc, or glibc?

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Jeff Pyle <jpyle@fidelityvoice.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running HEAD version from Jan 22 on an Alix board with an AMD Geode LX
> processor (i386).  I can sustain 30 concurrent calls averaging around 70%
> CPU utilization by the freeswitch process, measured by top.  Bypass media
> and proxy media are disabled.  PCMU is forced on both endpoints (no
> transcoding).
>
> The problem is the RAM usage over time.  The board has 256M.  Idle,
> freeswitch occupies around 4% after a fresh restart.  A minute or so after
> 30 calls are nailed up the RAM usage is about 7.2%.  After 5 minutes, 13.6%.
> After 60 minutes, near 65%.  Disconnecting the calls returns the RAM usage
> to 6-8%.
>
> I've not tried to troubleshoot an issue like this before.  Is valgrind the
> next step, or would something else make more sense?
>
>
> Regards,
> Jeff 



_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:+19193869900