My thought were as follows

If I could bind all of the internal extensions to an IP address, then I can limit the number of extension that are exposed to outside attack. So if I open up port 5090 and allow registration from internet based phones, I can limit it to only a couple of extensions rather than having all extensions open to the outside world.

The purpose of these few extensions is to allow someone in the office to transfer a call to someone on the road. They would not be given permission to use any of the gateways so even if someone did manage to hack in, they  would not be able to make long distance calls - limit the damage.

Does that make sense?

Regards
O

On 25/06/12 22:27, Michael Collins wrote:


On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Richard Brady <rnbrady@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there an equivalent for gateways?

I can't find a way to bind incoming calls from a CIDR to a particular gateway.

Just curious - what functionality do you need this for?
-MC



_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org