Brian,

Please forgive my slowness, but I’m still having problems with this. When you say that I “really didn’t auth the user”, did you mean the endpoint/extension?

If you did, I upped to svn1 16055 and placed a cidr attribute on the extension and reran the test, resulting in the same output, going to context public.

Further, I’m confused about your response about ACL compared with Billy W in an email of 12/22/2009.

“…you could simply put these entries in your internal sofia profile.

In that case, you do not need to include anything in the directory. The cidr entries in the directory are for providing additional control for each user id and what IPs they are allowed to make calls from.”

http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11633

Linux fs 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 #1 SMP Thu May 7 10:39:21 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Thanks Lars

From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:03 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Local call uses public context?

2009-12-23 15:00:01.955357 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5322 IP 192.168.10.105 Approved by acl "192.168.10.0/24[]". Access Granted.

Because the context is set on the profile as public... and you really didn't auth the user so user_context was never set.

On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Lars Zeb wrote:

I am trying to setup a second FS box from scratch using v16048.

What can cause a local call (81002, or 9996) to use context public? It’s a standard vanilla install.

http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11629

Thanks, Lars

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org