I guess if you insist, you have 4 bad boxes with 4 bad kernels, and I bet none of them are Centos 5.3
if you can reproduce it on a box I can visit (Centos 5.3 would be nice), put in my ssh key and i'll come and look.
Be sure to remember, as you continue to add to this thread that you are complaining about FS using 2% of your cpu......
That's somewhat amusing to me.
Sergey,
that's not a problem, is how FS works.
That load on the CPU when idle is actually not important. Is just the
minimum, like in a carburettor.
If you put it under load, you will see that there will need some
serious load (many calls) to have it ramp up the cpu usage.
-giovanni
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Sergey Okhapkin
--<sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> wrote:
> I see the same problem on 4 absolutely different boxes with different linux
> kernels.
>
> On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Anthony Minessale wrote:
>> Well, there you go.
>> your box is having a hard time doing a simple 1ms sleep in a loop for the
>> centralized core timer.
>>
>> It's either your kernel or your box. My box and every box I have do not
>> have that problem so you may want to consider a new one.
>>
>> FreeSWITCH is FREE so give it a good home.
>>
>> The good news is, you can make upwards of 1500 calls on that same 2% of cpu
>> usage.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Sergey Okhapkin
>>
>> <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org>wrote:
>> > FS spends half of CPU here (main thread):
>> >
>> > #0 0xffffe424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
>> > #1 0xb7a82781 in select () from /lib/libc.so.6
>> > #2 0xb7e392eb in apr_sleep () from
>> > /opt/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1 #3 0x00000000 in ?? ()
>> >
>> > The second half is spent here:
>> >
>> > #0 0xb7d50946 in clock_nanosleep () from /lib/librt.so.1
>> > #1 0xb7e0fa7d in softtimer_runtime () at src/switch_time.c:155
>> > #2 0xb7dc585a in switch_loadable_module_exec (thread=0xb7101fb8,
>> > obj=0xb7101da8) at src/switch_loadable_module.c:96
>> > #3 0xb7e379a8 in dummy_worker () from
>> > /opt/freeswitch/lib/libfreeswitch.so.1
>> >
>> > On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Moises Silva wrote:
>> > > ps -LlFm -p `pidof freeswitch`
>> > >
>> > > That shows you CPU usage per FreeSWITCH thread
>> > >
>> > > Then
>> > >
>> > > pstack `pidof freeswitch`
>> > >
>> > > That shows the stack trace of every FreeSWITCH thread and then you can
>> >
>> > find
>> >
>> > > exactly what is doing.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
Sincerely,
Giovanni Maruzzelli
Cell : +39-347-2665618
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org