On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:00 AM, kokoska rokoska <
kokoska.rokoska@post.cz> wrote:
Jonathan Palley napsal(a):
> I get the feeling that some of these edge optimizations are,
> rightfully, not the top priority for the core team.
I think so. And this why I think about to do it myself :-)
If someone other see it useful...
> If you make
> these changes I'm happy to help test as all of our users are behind a
> NAT.
If I have success in doing such changes to sources, I'm very glad if you
help me with testing. Thanks Jonathan!
> Right now we don't have enough users to justify doing this
> optimization ourselves though.
>
And I have nearly no experiences with FreeSWITCH :-)
> As for keeping the UDP connection open I recommend having the client
> send "blank" UDP packets and setting the interval there.
>
Yes, I agree. But few of them (for example Nokia mobile phones) can't do
that. And this why should I send keep-alive packets (dummy packets or
valid OPTIONS), but only to few of NATed UACs. Thus I have to have an
option to distinguish between UACs which need to be nat-pinged and which
not :-)