Tried the correction but nogo.

I am trying to replace an SPA9000 which when it bridges the call to the
cell phone passes the caller ID, so this must mean the ITSP works.

I saw "Call-ID: 2b14dba5-0dc7-4545-b7f7-4747ca492f59" in the sofia
trace. Since it's coded I don't know what was sent.

I thought I would see that in a trace. I even tried:

<action application="bridge"
data="[sip_cid_type=none,effective_caller_id_number=4081234567]sofia/gateway/uid1/19161112222"/>

On 09/24/10 13:28, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:

Correction:

bridge [sip_cid_type=none]sofia/etc

[] but not {}

On Friday 24 September 2010, David Ponzone wrote:

Mario,

To save you some time, most carriers will accept in the FROM field.

AFAIR, FS defaults to Remote-Party-Id, so perhaps you just need to set

this before your dialstring:

bridge {sip_cid_type=none}sofia/etc...

David Ponzone  Direction Technique

email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr

tel:      01 74 03 18 97

gsm:   06 66 98 76 34

Service Client IPeva

tel:      0811 46 26 26

www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis

à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou

diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est

susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au

titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si

vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire

immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.

Le 24/09/2010 à 21:54, Sergey Okhapkin a écrit :

Does the gateway uid1 allow to specify CID number?

On Friday 24 September 2010, Mario wrote:

I am bridging a call from either inside or outside to an emergency

number on an att cellphone which works fine. I am trying to pass the

original caller id or anything else for that matter as the caller

id/name. I only get "unknown". I also tried to send to a VOIP

number and

it also gets "unknown" so I am thinking it is not att. I tried

various

combinations of things I found on the web but nogo. Anyone see the

problem below? Thanks!

Mario

 <extension name="mx911">

   <condition field="destination_number" expression="^2911$">

     <action application="set"

data="effective_caller_id_name=Emergency"/> <action application="set"

data="effective_caller_id_number=9161234567"/>

     <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/>

     <action application="bridge" data="sofia/gateway/

uid1/19161112222"/>

   </condition>

 </extension>

_______________________________________________

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org

http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users

UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users

http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org

http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users

UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users

http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org

http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users

UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users

http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org