The comment suggests you didn't read any of the past replies.  FS runs on windows without fork and exec so clearly its possible.  On unix its the defacto way to do it and nontheless as I already stated we default to doing it with threads.   Don't translate your lack of understanding for a fault against us. 

On Friday, August 14, 2015, Abdul Hakeem <alhakeem@ipextelecom.net> wrote:
Hello,

I didn't pursue it, I spoke to a few people who let me down.
It sounds like a good idea though, especially with the advantages of Java NIO .
There really is no reason why FS should fork a process for such tiny tasks.
If you are willing to give it a shot, let me know.

Regards,
Abdul Hakeem

-----Original Message-----
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of ?????? ???????
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 5:47 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Fork( ) and Exec ( ) functions

Abdul, have you any success?


--
? ?????????, ??????? ?????? ?????????
??????? ??? «???????»
e-mail: 112@megafit.su
???: +7 (383) 311-09-09 (???.112)




_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org





--
Anthony Minessale II       ♬ @anthmfs  ♬ @FreeSWITCH  ♬

ClueCon Weekly Development Call 
☎ sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org  ☎ +19193869900