I will try to send more specific information. But, at this moment, i don't have it. I am almost sure you doesn't know about this implementation. It is from an Asian University. Sorry if I can not give more details.
Unfortunately the table you provided doesn't explain adequately what it
is that I'm looking at a comparison of. I'm a bit confused because g729
does not support all of the sample rates here, and according to what
I've read g729.1 supports wideband up to 32k. If you could please
clarify what these statistics are for, I'd appreciate it. I am not able
to wrap my head around what the proprietary implementation of g729 that
you are referring to (you have not revealed what it is) does that the
existing code does not do or could not be made to do.
-Yossi
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org