On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:55 PM, Roland Hänel wrote:
Hello Brian,
As I wrote, I was already aware of that. However I think it would make
sense to improve the handling on the FS side because
- the response of FS is clearly faulty, if FS doesn't like the FB offer
it could reject the call, but sending 200 OK with port 0 is incorrect.
Especially when the SDP data in debugging is not the same as the data we
see in the SIP packet
- though incorrect, the G722/16000 thing is not uncommon. According to
some reports I googled Grandstream and others also misbehave in that way.
Because FS is friendly, I'd suggest to answer the request for G722/16000
with G722/8000 and everything will probably just work out fine. By the way,
the debugging output suggests that exactly this was the intent of the
author - but there seems to be a bug that prevents this SDP from making it
into the 200 OK packet.
Roland