So why not just <action application="redirect" data="sip:foo@bar.com "/> to a closer FS node ??

dont get me wrong, I can see some of the appeal for what your suggesting.

I have also had similar thoughts in the past...

but I keep coming back to the fact you could use FS instead of RTP Proxy... and just sip redirect it.

The ONLY downside I could ever see would be... what if the customer dosnt follow the redirect.

A re-invite with new IP and port is probably a little safer.

Jay

On 23 May 2013 06:59, adahary <adahary@gmail.com> wrote:

My plan is to use the FS as a centralized SIP proxy/registrar and several
RTPproxy media server in different locations so users could get better
latency when bridged over.

Yes, the RTPproxy is controled by some API commands (google around).
I'll use the xml_curl with PHP to request from the RTPproxy ip/udp ports
and then update A&B SDPs.

I'm just missing the last part of 'update A&B SDPs' ;

adahary

--
View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/FreeSwitch-Proxy-RTPProxy-Media-server-tp7590972p7590974.html

Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

--
Sincerely

Jay