I've been wondering this for a few years too. I'm guessing that comment has scared everyone away from enabling it to test it out.

At a guess if there's any issue it's within the Sofia-SIP stack and therefore trickier to debug/patch than in mod_sofia.

You could enable it and if there are any problems report them on Jira so they get looked into.

I believe 100rel might be required for IMS implementations.

On 17 April 2018 at 06:08, David Witham <david.witham@netsip.com.au> wrote:
Hi all,

We have had an upstream provider request that we enable 100rel support. I note in the wiki it says:

enable-100rel

This enable support for 100rel (100% reliability - PRACK message as defined in RFC3262) This fixes a problem with SIP where provisional messages like "180 Ringing" are not ACK'd and therefore could be dropped over a poor connection without retransmission. *2009-07-08:* Enabling this may cause FreeSWITCH to crash, see FSCORE-392.

<param name="enable-100rel" value="true"/>


FSCORE-392 doesn't say if the crashing related to enabling 100rel was ever fixed. Can anyone confirm whether it is now safe to enable 100rel support?

regards,
David

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org