if you bind the same profile to more than one ip, all your traffic would come in one ip and out another and cause tremendous confusion.
To see a working example of this problem see asterisk https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=2358
(note bkw and mikej contribute to this bug)
Here is me reporting a similar issue in IAX (my only negative karma ever on that site)
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=7315
moral of the story is, it's unwise to bind multiple ip to a server interface that uses UDP signalling and the SIP spec requires
a UA to have one specific URL
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe@gundy.org> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:It sure would be nice to be able to provide a list of IPs in one
> It not possible to use 0.0.0.0 for on profile. however, you can create more
> sip profiles for each of your interfaces. Search freeswitch-users archievs
> then you will find similar topics.
profile. Seems like I run into that need often. Instead, I end up
making two profiles that are mostly the same.
Is there a reason why this is the way it is?
A SIP profile is a user agent. By design it services exactly one IP/Port combo. If you are finding that you need to have multiple IP's or ports in a single SIP profile then that suggests to me that you might be trying to use the wrong tool for the job. What are the scenarios where you feel you need a single profile to handle multiple IP addresses? My guess is that bkw and the gang will have suggestions for an elegant solution that will fit your needs.
-MC
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org