Ah, yeah that changes the playing field for sure.

The problem with CHAR is the INSERT speed though, and I've seen similar issues on other builds too.. after you push past a few million rows, it really starts to slow down.. If the database was in memory, it might not be such an issue though.

In some ways it 'feels cleaner' using a separate table and then JOIN on a BIGINT autoinc column, as the thought of JOIN'ing and GROUP BY on a BINARY seems wrong. 

Another option would be to take an SHA1 hash of the UUID, then convert that from hex to bin, and put that in the BINARY field.. this way you can guarantee each UUID will be the same size, not worry about changes in data schema, and get the INSERT speed benefits of the BINARY too - thoughts?

Cal

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
+1

Also as an example the 'inbound-use-callid-as-uuid' parameter I mentioned before is a Sofia profile parameter that uses the Call-ID header value from the INVITE sent by the caller as the UUID for the channel. That could be useful for example in matching up channels against SIP traces as you only need to store 1 ID not 2. I frequently see ones for example of $UUID@$SERVER.COM - far longer than 128bits, and using characters other than 0-9A-F so that it can't be folded into bits.

In this case a CHAR column becomes most flexible and the BIGINT column gives you the speed advantage of the BINARY.

-Steve



On 17 February 2013 22:39, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:
you can use any arbitrary string as uuid, say

originate {origination_uuid=my-uuid-that-is-not-128-bit}user/1000 ….

On Monday, February 18, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote:

Thanks for the feedback Steve, 

In ref to auto inc, actually, I have! :) In the code on the blog, it shows that the tables uses a BIGINT auto increment for each row, and the performance was still good. However, using this approach introduces an unnecessary JOIN and uses more index and table space - unless I've missed something?

Could you elaborate more on the UUIDs that may not be 128-bit? My google-fu failed me :/

Cal

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Another possibility you haven't looked at is having a table of UUIDs with a BIGINT auto_increment PK and using that as keys in other takes with a foreign key relationship (whether defined or implied). That would give you a smaller integer (hence faster select/insert/join/etc) that's still guaranteed to be unique. Though the auto_increment INSERT could then become a bottleneck (hint run a recent 5.5/5.6 MySQL version at the very least since that bottleneck while still present was very much reduced).

-Steve



On 17 February 2013 20:55, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <cal.leeming@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
Hi all,

Just spent a little while comparing the performance of heavy INSERT/SELECT performance against UUID fields in a MySQL database.

Full performance breakdown and write up can be found here;

So far, the best option seems to be storing the UUID as a BINARY(16) - anyone have any thoughts on this?

Thanks

Cal

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server

Official FreeSWITCH Sites

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org