Transactions are by default supported by mysql, the transactions are driven by sql statements themselves. 

Your statement is either incorrect or I interpret it wrong. 

Sent from my mobile device

On Oct 27, 2011, at 20:09, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:

mysql does not work with transactions by default in defense of injection attacks... read the thread its in the top.


On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
Thanks Ken. here the link of official SIPP website
 
I didn't know it was a HP app ! :0)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Rice
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] High load on database server

SIPP works fine for this... However keep in mind some of their default scenario files arent exactly the best in the world and can in many situations leave a bit to be desired... Check the wiki I think there is more info on this on there

K


On 10/27/11 12:51 PM, "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:

on this subject,
is SIPp can be used to test to reproduce hundreds calls ?

----- Original Message -----
 
From:  Anthony Minessale <mailto:anthony.minessale@gmail.com>  
 
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>   
 
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 1:39  PM
 
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] High load  on database server
 

BTW I know it's a contradiction to tell you to consider older  ODBC and newer FS but I wrote FS so I can attest to its stability especially  the ODBC code in the core.

 

 


 
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Anthony Minessale  <anthony.minessale@gmail.com>  wrote:
 

Let's recap
 

 
You have 4 moving parts, you have various versions of all 4 to choose  from and even different implementations of 3 of the 4.
 

ODBC LIB
ODBC DRIVER
 
DATABASE
 
FS
 

 
You must choose a stable combination of all 4 which may require  specific configuration of each component as well.
 

 
My only issue is FUD, I do not want people to advertise that FS does  not work on ODBC under load when the whole story is FS does not work under  load when you use fooODBC with barDRIVER with basBASE database server  configured a particular way.
 

 
It should never crash, if it does, its a bug in something.  I can  speak for FS that there is no bug there.  The other 3 are  variables.
 
Remember this next time there is a discussion about using system libs  and why we build our own depends.  The one thing we use system libs  for, ODBC, is a huge PITA.........
 

 
Things to remember:
 

 
1) try the Threading=0 in the odbcinst.ini, this is a serious problem  and has been made the default in latest versions.
 
2) If you must use Mysql, enable transactions and make sure your  odbc.ini is referencing the threadsafe version of the lib
 
     libmyodbc3_r.so <-- note _r
 
3) Try various combos of drivers and odbc libs, many time newer is not  better, stable versions lie in the past.
 
4) build the drivers and odbc yourself or get the debug symbols so you  can get a backtrace, you could be finding a bug for them.......
 
5) Find a test to reproduce your problem so you can try different  database engines and driver combos.
 
6) Make sure you are on latest FS git so you know you have a stable  copy.
 

 

 
Anyway, this is a pain, that's why ppl pay you to do it.
 
Discuss this all you want here, just minimize any FUD to scare away  people who want to use it.
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 


 
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Hynek Cihlar <hynek.cihlar@gmail.com> wrote:
 
Do not agree. Issues happening under extreme cases like  high load with
some specific conditions are hard to reproduce, sharing  the
information in this case is a lot more efficient, for all.
 

Sent from my mobile device

 
 
 
On Oct 27, 2011, at 18:56, Robert Huddleston <rhuddleston@gmail.com> wrote:

> My bologna  has a first name - it's O S C A R...
>
> This topic is getting  really old... I have to agree with Antm - get out of
> the lazy  pants and do some research / hard work.
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org
>  [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf  Of Sergey
> Okhapkin
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:43  PM
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re:  [Freeswitch-users] High load on database server
>
> What do  you mean "shared ODBC"?
>
> On Thursday 27 October 2011,  Madovsky wrote:
>> but, is anyone experienced that with shared  ODBC ? (managing more than 330
>> concurrent  calls)
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: "Madovsky" <infos@madovsky.org>
>> To: "FreeSWITCH Users  Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
>>  Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:33 PM
>> Subject: Re:  [Freeswitch-users] High load on database  server
>>
>>> ha ok, good luck  so
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message  -----
>>> From: "Cliff Wells" <cliff@develix.com>
>>> To: "FreeSWITCH  Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
>>>  Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:26 PM
>>> Subject: Re:  [Freeswitch-users] High load on database  server
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 11:55  -0400, Madovsky wrote:
>>>>> I means that depend the  quality of your script ;)
>>>>
>>>> Quality  isn't the issue here.  The script is too simple to be  incorrect
>>>> (and it carefully releases the odbc  connection back to the pool in a
>>>> hangup handler).   I have written poor-quality code plenty of times,  but
>>>> 25 years as a programmer usually allows me the  luxury of knowing when
>>>> I'm doing it,  thanks.
>>>>
>>>> In any case, Lua scripts  work fine.  Google will tell you that unixODBC
>>>>  before 2.3.0 was a bit of a mess, so I expect the issue lies there,  but
>>>> again, I emphasize, everything WORKS GREAT (been  using it for a couple
>>>> of years now) until you get to  very high concurrency (about 330
>>>> concurrent calls on a  single system).  If you don't expect to handle
>>>>  more than 300 concurrent calls, then you do not need to worry about  it.
>>>> At all.
>>>>
>>>>  Regards,
>>>>  Cliff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>>>>  http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>>
>  UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>>>  http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>  FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>  UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>  http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>  FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>  UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>  http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>  FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>  UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>  http://www.freeswitch.org


FreeSWITCH-users  mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


 

 




FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:+19193869900

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org