When memory stays at 50-60M without nibblebill and grows to 300M with... It's
definetily a leak. valgring log is available, but there is nothing suspicious
in it... Try to enable niblebill yourself.
On Saturday 17 April 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> 100M may just be the memory it is really using for what it is doing and not
> a leak. Have you seen anything to tell you this is actually a leak?
> Have you run under valgrind or some similar tool to confirm?
>
> Mike
>
> On Apr 17, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > I want to utilize nibblebill features for prepaid support, but as soon as
> > I enable nibble billing with
> >
> > set nibble_rate=XXX
> > set nibble_account=NNNNNN
> > set enable_heartbeat_events=60
> >
> > in dialplan, FS process begins to eat more and more memory, RSS grows
> > from 23M to 100M and more after processing few thousands calls and
> > continues to grow. If I comment out those 3 lines from dialplan, then FS
> > RSS grows from initial 23M to 50-60M (depending on the number of
> > concurrent calls) and stays at this value, no memory leaks.
> >
> > Do anybody use mod_nibblebill?
> >
> > I'm experiencing this problem with all svn versions I tried including
> > latest git version.
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org