Hi Mike,

One reason could be to deal with symmetric NAT.  However, it's not very common, so I definitely see your point.


On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
Freeswitch can not act as a stun server, but there are a number of open source stun servers available that you can use.  There is no reason for us to recreate the wheel when they already exist.

Mike

On Mar 20, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> WebRTC requires STUN servers to get the external IP address for ICE candidates.
>
> I would prefer not to rely on external STUN servers (google, etc) in my production environment.  Ideally I'd prefer to use the FreeSWITCH server I need to connect to as my STUN server.
>
> Is this possible?  Can FS act as a STUN server?


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org