Hi,
have you checked your switch.conf.xml configuration for
"sessions-per-second" value?
<param name="sessions-per-second" value="30"/>
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Daniel Neubert
On 28.07.2010 08:54, Durmuş Ali Öztürk wrote:
I will try to set up a fs system on CentOS, maybe
the
performance will be better.
I am sorry but I dont understand the difference between cps and number
of active session.
If fs has 10 active sessions (with media), then the call per second
should be 10 too??
2010/7/28 Phillip Jones-2 [via
freeswitch-users]
<[hidden email]>
>>
The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get
the latest source
code
That would seem like a reasonable thing to do.....
>>
In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling
parallel
30 number?
In my (limited) experience there are two important things to control:
1) call per second
2) Total number of active sessions
Calls per seconds appears (to me) to have a greater effect on the CPU.
So at 1 call per second I would be looking at your CPU utilization and
if it is maxing out then reducing that rate.
My point being here that your box *may* be capable of handling 100 or
1000 sessions, if the cps is lowered.
HTH
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
[hidden email]
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
View this message in context: Re:
100 parallel calls not possible (Performance problems)