Making a Windows only version of Freeswitch doesn’t make sense, especially a .NET only version. Freeswitch already provides great Windows and .NET support running either on or off Windows which is something that most other open source telephony applications do not have. And having the freedom to build it on Windows or Linux is a huge advantage and convenience.

 

Having said that it would be interesting to see what you have done source code wise… but I’m afraid that you are dismissing the importance of one of Freeswitch’s best features and I cringe at the direction you are taking. Being a Windows developer 90% of the time myself I do get embarrassed by Windows developer’s OS arrogance sometimes and I see why so many Linux people only produce Linux based open source software.

 

John

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Chad Vogel
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Feedback

 

Hello,

I wanted to reach out and get some feedback from everyone because my company started a project using FS as base several weeks ago, our goal was to optimize and integrate FS more directly into Windows environments. Here is my question, we would like to share our changes and where should we host our project? Because we understand our build breaks compatibility with the UNIX environments and fails to meet the objectives cross platform compatibility, however it could contribute greatly and be beneficial to other windows users.

Here are some of the changes we have made: